MHB Calculating Genus of a Curve Using Falting's Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter bitsmath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve
AI Thread Summary
To find the genus of the curve defined by the equation x^2 - x + y - y^5 = 0, it is identified as a hyper-elliptic curve with a genus of 2. Falting's theorem indicates that curves with a genus greater than 1 have finitely many rational points, which is relevant to the discussion. The computation of the genus can be approached using techniques related to Riemann surfaces, such as the Riemann-Hurwitz formula. Participants suggest consulting established resources on Riemann surfaces for detailed methods of genus calculation. Understanding these concepts is essential for applying Falting's theorem effectively.
bitsmath
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello!
I would like to learn finding genus of my curve $x^2-x+y-y^5$. Also, I want to know how to apply Falting's Theorem to conclude finitely many rational points of my curve.
Thanks in advance!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Where did you find this problem?

For the question, Falting's theorem states that if the genus of a given curve is $> 1$ then it has finitely many $\Bbb Q$-points. So having the genus automatically answers your second question about Falting, so that part is superfluous.

Not really sure how to compute genus of this particular curve. Have you looked at the corresponding Riemannsurface over $\Bbb P^1$? Perhaps Riemann-Hurwitz or some such?
 
bitsmath said:
Hello!
I would like to learn finding genus of my curve x^2-x+y-y^5 = 0. This is no doubt, it is hyper-elliptic curve and has genus 2. But, I do not know the technique of finding genus. Awaiting suitable reply.

Thanks in advance! Please explain

- - - Updated - - -

mathbalarka said:
Where did you find this problem?

For the question, Falting's theorem states that if the genus of a given curve is $> 1$ then it has finitely many $\Bbb Q$-points. So having the genus automatically answers your second question about Falting, so that part is superfluous.

Not really sure how to compute genus of this particular curve. Have you looked at the corresponding Riemannsurface over $\Bbb P^1$? Perhaps Riemann-Hurwitz or some such?[Sir, I got your message and I re-edited my question by equating to 0. Please explain how to find genus of my curve. This problem is self made.]
 
Well, I have already given you a plausible way to approach this. There are pretty well-known formulas for calculating genus of Riemann surfaces, try them out! If you don't know how to compute genus of Riemann surfaces, try getting a decent book.

This is no doubt, it is hyper-elliptic curve and has genus 2.

If you already know that it has genus 2, what is your question?
 
mathbalarka said:
Well, I have already given you a plausible way to approach this. There are pretty well-known formulas for calculating genus of Riemann surfaces, try them out! If you don't know how to compute genus of Riemann surfaces, try getting a decent book.
If you already know that it has genus 2, what is your question?

I Don't know how to find genus of my curve. I understand by your quote, it has 2. But I want to learn how you came to know that, genus of my curve is 2?[/QUOTE]
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top