MHB Calculating Geometric Probability on a Round Table

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the geometric probability of a coin landing entirely within a smaller circle on a round table. The original poster calculated the probability as 81/2500, considering the area of the large circle as the sample space and adjusting the area of the small circle to account for the coin's radius. However, other participants pointed out that the correct approach should factor in the coin's radius, leading to a different probability calculation. The correct probability should be based on the adjusted areas, resulting in a final answer of (9/49)^2. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting the dimensions involved in geometric probability problems.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have a question related to geometric probability. I think I solved it, but not sure, would appreciate your opinion.

We are given a round table with a radius of 50cm. At the center of this table there is another circle, with a radius of 10cm. A coin with a radius of 1cm is thrown on the table. Assuming that it landed on the table, what is the probability that the coin (the entire coin) is within the small circle ?

I said that the area of the big circle is

\[2500\pi\]

this is the sample space.

The set of the required event is the points creating the area of the small circle, but going 1cm inside, to allow the entire coin to be inside, so it is:

\[81\pi\]

Therefore the probability is:

\[\frac{81}{2500}\]

Am I correct ?

Thank you !
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would be inclined to say:

$$P(x)=\frac{\pi\left(10-\dfrac{1}{2}\right)^2}{\pi\left(50-\dfrac{1}{2}\right)^2}=\left(\frac{19}{99}\right)^2$$
 
Not sure where Mark's $\dfrac12$ is coming from. The question says that the radius (not the diameter!) of the coin is 1cm. So I would give the answer as $\left(\dfrac9{49}\right)^2$. This assumes that the coin has to land so that it is entirely on the table. The OP's answer $\dfrac{81}{2500}$ assumes that it is allowed to land so that it precariously overlaps the edge of the table.
 
Yes, I misread radius as diameter...oops. :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top