Calculating Probability of Measuring +h/2 in 1D HO

In summary, the question is asking for the probability of getting something when measuring in a three state system. The answer is given by the sum of the probabilities of all the independent ways of getting something.
  • #1
oww
2
0
Hello everyone.

I have a question that i think belongs here or in the linear algebra section; but now i put it here, maybe someone will move the post if it's in the wrong place.

The question:

I have a normalized (1D) state in the x-axis in the harmonic oscillator

[tex]\Psi(x,t=0)=1/\sqrt{45}(6u_0(x)\chi_+ +(2+i)u_1\chi_- -2u_1(x)\chi_+[/tex]

where [tex]u_n[/tex] is the n'th normalized eigenstate of the 1D HO and [tex]\chi_{+/-}[/tex] are the normalized eigenspinors in z-direction. Now i must find the possibility of getting the result +h/2 when i measure [tex]S_y[/tex]. My idea was to take the inner product with the desired state and square the coefficient:
[tex]prob(h/2)=(\left\langle \chi^y_+ | \Psi\right\rangle)^2[/tex]
but how do i do that when i have both spinors(vectors) and functions of x at the same time? If anyone could do the calculation stepwise, I would appreciate it very much!

Best regards
Oistein
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I would not care about the spatial part, the spin "lives" in another hilbert space than the spatial wave functions [itex] u_n(x) [/itex]

So just do [tex] = | \langle \chi^y_+ | \Psi \rangle |^2 [/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Your Hilbert space comprises the following states
[tex] \left|u_0, +\right\rangle_y, \left|u_0, -\right\rangle_y, \left|u_1, +\right\rangle_y, \left|u_1, -\right\rangle_y, \dots [/tex]
I have changed into the y basis for convenience. You'll have to do the same, somehow.

The probability of getting something is equal to the sum of the probabilities of all the independent ways of getting something. The possible ways of getting +h/2 from [tex]S_y[/tex] by finding the state to be in the following states:
[tex] \left|u_0, +\right\rangle_y, \left|u_1, +\right\rangle_y \dots [/tex]

In other words,
[tex]P(+) = P(u_0,+) + P(u_1,+) + P(u_2,+) ... [/tex]
or
[tex]P(+) = |\left\langle \psi | u_0,+ \right\rangle |^2 + |\left\langle \psi | u_1,+ \right\rangle |^2 + |\left\langle \psi | u_2,+ \right\rangle |^2... [/tex]

Note that the projection operator I'm considering is
[tex]\mathcal{P} = \sum_n \left|u_n, +\right\rangle \left\langle u_n, +\right|[/tex],
and that
[tex]\left\langle \psi \right| \left(\mathcal{P} \left|\psi\right\rangle\right) = P(+)[/tex]

To convince yourself that what I'm doing is Kosher, what is the probability that measuring L_z on a three-state system with wf [tex]\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\left|-1\right\rangle + \tfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\left|0\right\rangle + \tfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\left|1\right\rangle[/tex] will yield a value greater than -h?. Clearly it is 2/3. You can also calculate this by finding the projection operator for the possibilities in consideration.
 
  • #4
Diagonalize sigma y to get the unitary matrix(rotation, 90 degrees about the z axis) to convert toe the y basis.. This transformation does not effect the spatial part of the wave function, and allows you to express the wave function in eigenstates of sigma y. The rest is standard QM -- just keep the new spin up states. I've just said what Ibrits did, in a slightly different form.
Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 

FAQ: Calculating Probability of Measuring +h/2 in 1D HO

1. What is the meaning of +h/2 in 1D HO?

+h/2 in 1D HO refers to the measurement of the spin of a particle in a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator. This value represents the spin of the particle in the positive direction.

2. How is the probability of measuring +h/2 calculated?

The probability of measuring +h/2 in 1D HO is calculated using the wave function of the particle. The square of the wave function at a given point represents the probability of finding the particle in that state. Thus, the probability of measuring +h/2 can be calculated by squaring the wave function at the point corresponding to +h/2.

3. Can the probability of measuring +h/2 ever be 100%?

No, the probability of measuring +h/2 cannot be 100%. According to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, it is impossible to know both the position and momentum of a particle with 100% certainty. This means that there will always be a small probability of measuring a different spin value.

4. What factors affect the probability of measuring +h/2?

The probability of measuring +h/2 in 1D HO is affected by the energy level of the particle, as well as the strength of the harmonic potential. A higher energy level or a stronger potential will result in a higher probability of measuring +h/2.

5. Can the probability of measuring +h/2 change over time?

Yes, the probability of measuring +h/2 can change over time. This is because the wave function of a particle in a harmonic oscillator is constantly evolving and changing shape. As the wave function changes, so does the probability of measuring +h/2 at a given time.

Back
Top