- #1
jacobrhcp
- 169
- 0
[SOLVED] simple electrostatics problem
a cylinder, the inhomogenous E field is given by [tex] E = E_{0} (\frac{r}{R})^{3} [/tex]
the assignment was to calculate Q of a piece of the cylinder of length L in two different ways, by gauss law in integral form and in differential form
[tex]\oint E dA = \frac{Q}{e_{0}}[/tex]
so [tex]Q = 2\pi e_{0} L E_{0} R[/tex]
the other way around, [tex]\nabla E = \frac{\rho}{e_{0}}[/tex]
so [tex] \rho = e_{0} E_{0} 3 \frac{r^{2}}{R^{3}} [/tex]
so [tex] Q = e_{0} E_{0} 3 \oint \frac{r^{2}}{R^{3}} r dr d\theta dl = 2 \pi e_{0} E_{0} \frac{3}{4} L R [/tex]
which is a factor 3/4 different from my other expression for Q
where did I go wrong?
Homework Statement
a cylinder, the inhomogenous E field is given by [tex] E = E_{0} (\frac{r}{R})^{3} [/tex]
the assignment was to calculate Q of a piece of the cylinder of length L in two different ways, by gauss law in integral form and in differential form
The Attempt at a Solution
[tex]\oint E dA = \frac{Q}{e_{0}}[/tex]
so [tex]Q = 2\pi e_{0} L E_{0} R[/tex]
the other way around, [tex]\nabla E = \frac{\rho}{e_{0}}[/tex]
so [tex] \rho = e_{0} E_{0} 3 \frac{r^{2}}{R^{3}} [/tex]
so [tex] Q = e_{0} E_{0} 3 \oint \frac{r^{2}}{R^{3}} r dr d\theta dl = 2 \pi e_{0} E_{0} \frac{3}{4} L R [/tex]
which is a factor 3/4 different from my other expression for Q
where did I go wrong?
Last edited: