Calculating Self Capacitance of an Isolated Sphere

In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of the self capacitance of a middle sphere in a system of three spheres with given potentials. The approach suggested is to treat the setup as two parallel capacitors and use Gauss's Law to find the potential difference between the middle sphere and the inner and outer spheres. The potential difference is then equated to determine the self capacitance.
  • #1
Saitama
4,243
93

Homework Statement


(see attachment)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The self capacitance of an isolated sphere is ##4\pi \epsilon_o R## where R is the radius of sphere but I am not sure how to begin on this one.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • P1.png
    P1.png
    31.4 KB · Views: 591
  • 1718-small.png
    1718-small.png
    10.8 KB · Views: 537
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I do not think it is correct to talk about self-capacitance here. Self-capacitance involves a potential difference with a infinitely far away object, while in this case you are given two other objects at finite distances. I think you could treat the setup as two parallel capacitors, formed by spheres 1-2 and 2-3.
 
  • #3
Add some charge Q onto the middle sphere, find the electric field and potential in the regions between the spheres. You know that the potential is zero on the inner and outer sphere.

ehild
 
  • #4
voko said:
I think you could treat the setup as two parallel capacitors, formed by spheres 1-2 and 2-3.
But how will that help in finding the self capacitance of the middle sphere?

ehild said:
Add some charge Q onto the middle sphere, find the electric field and potential in the regions between the spheres. You know that the potential is zero on the inner and outer sphere.

Electric field outside the sphere is given by ##kQ/r^2## and inside it is zero but I am still clueless. :(
 
  • #5
Pranav-Arora said:
But how will that help in finding the self capacitance of the middle sphere?

You have ignored what I wrote earlier.
 
  • #6
voko said:
You have ignored what I wrote earlier.

Can you please shed some more light on this? I have checked your post more than 10 times but I still can't see what I have missed.
 
  • #7
You are explicitly given potentials between three objects, with finite distances from one another. Self-capacitance, however, is defined in terms of the potential difference with an infinite-radius sphere. You can't have it both ways.
 
  • #8
voko said:
You are explicitly given potentials between three objects, with finite distances from one another. Self-capacitance, however, is defined in terms of the potential difference with an infinite-radius sphere. You can't have it both ways.

Do you mean that the given question is wrong then?

Continuing ehild's suggestion, if I give a charge to the middle sphere, will there be any charges induced on the other spheres?
 
  • #9
Pranav-Arora said:
Do you mean that the given question is wrong then?
Why should it be wrong?
Pranav-Arora said:
Continuing ehild's suggestion, if I give a charge to the middle sphere, will there be any charges induced on the other spheres?

Why not?

ehild
 
  • #10
ehild said:
Why not?

ehild

Please see the attachment if I have mentioned the induced charges properly (I think they are wrong).

If they are right, should I calculate the potential at the surface of innermost and outermost spheres and set them equal to zero?

I did these types of problems in the past but now I have completely forgotten how to do them. :(
 

Attachments

  • spheres.png
    spheres.png
    13.7 KB · Views: 735
  • #11
Pranav-Arora said:
Please see the attachment if I have mentioned the induced charges properly (I think they are wrong).

If they are right, should I calculate the potential at the surface of innermost and outermost spheres and set them equal to zero?

I did these types of problems in the past but now I have completely forgotten how to do them. :(
attachment.php?attachmentid=56603&d=1363025956.png



That looks good to me, except for the charge on the outside of the outer sphere.
 
  • #12
SammyS said:
That looks good to me, except for the charge on the outside of the outer sphere.

Yes, I too think that its wrong that's why I wrote in brackets that they look wrong to me. Any hint about what should be those charges?
 
  • #13
Pranav-Arora said:
Yes, I too think that its wrong that's why I wrote in brackets that they look wrong to me. Any hint about what should be those charges?

that is zero outside.

ehild
 
  • #14
Pranav-Arora said:
Yes, I too think that its wrong that's why I wrote in brackets that they look wrong to me. Any hint about what should be those charges?
The potential of the sphere is zero, so the electric field exterior to the sphere must be zero.
 
  • #15
SammyS said:
The potential of the sphere is zero, so the electric field exterior to the sphere must be zero.

The charges mentioned on the inner surface of outermost sphere are right?

When I calculate the potential, do I need to add potential of both outer and inner surfaces of each sphere? :confused:
 
  • #16
Pranav-Arora said:
The charges mentioned on the inner surface of outermost sphere are right?
Yes. The charge on the inner surface are exactly opposite the charge on the outer surface of the middle shell.

When I calculate the potential, do I need to add potential of both outer and inner surfaces of each sphere? :confused:
No. (Assuming I understand your question correctly.)

The potential difference between the middle & outer shells should give you the charge, Q - q1 .

The potential difference between the inner & middle shells should give you the charge, q1 .
 
  • #17
Apply Gauss's Law in the regions between the spheres. Integrate the electric field to get the potential difference between the middle sphere and the inner one, and also between the middle sphere and the outer one. They must be equal.

ehild
 
  • #18
ehild said:
Apply Gauss's Law in the regions between the spheres. Integrate the electric field to get the potential difference between the middle sphere and the inner one, and also between the middle sphere and the outer one. They must be equal.

ehild

The potential difference between the innermost and the middle sphere is:
[tex]kq_1 \left(\frac{1}{R_1}-\frac{1}{R_2}\right)[/tex]

The potential difference between the middle sphere and the outermost sphere is:
[tex]k(Q-q_1)\left(\frac{1}{R_3}-\frac{1}{R_2}\right)[/tex]

Have I calculated the potential difference right?
 
  • #19
Check the sign of the second one.
 
  • #20
ehild said:
Check the sign of the second one.

I expected you to say that but I couldn't find the mistake in my working.
Potential at the surface of outer sphere is ##k(Q-q_1)/R_3## and potential at the surface of middle sphere is ##k(Q-q_1)/R_2##, therefore the potential difference is [tex]k(Q-q_1)\left(\frac{1}{R_3}-\frac{1}{R_2}\right)[/tex].
:confused:
 
  • #21
The potential of both the inner and the outer sphere is zero (with respect to infinity). Assuming positive Q, the potential of the middle sphere is positive. What is the potential of the middle sphere?
You can not write the potential in this problem as kQ/r, as it is zero both at r=R1 and r=R3.
Do what I said about the electric field.


ehild
 
  • #22
ehild said:
You can not write the potential in this problem as kQ/r, as it is zero both at r=R1 and r=R3.
Do what I said about the electric field.

The electric field between the middle sphere and the outermost sphere is ##k(Q-q_1)/r^2##.
[tex]V(R_3)-V(R_2)=-\int_{R_2}^{R_3} \vec{E} \cdot \vec{dr}[/tex]

##V(R_3)=0##. Hence
[tex]V(R_2)=k(Q-q_1)\left(\frac{1}{R_2}-\frac{1}{R_3}\right)[/tex]

Is this right?
 
  • #23
It is right. Now express V(R2) using the electric field between the innermost sphere and the middle one.
 
  • #24
ehild said:
It is right. Now express V(R2) using the electric field between the innermost sphere and the middle one.

[tex]V(R_2)-V(R_1)=-\int_{R_1}^{R_2} \frac{-kQ}{r^2} dr[/tex]
Solving
[tex]V(R_2)=kq_1 \left(\frac{1}{R_1}-\frac{1}{R_2}\right)[/tex]

Equating both the expressions
[tex](Q-q_1)\left(\frac{1}{R_2}-\frac{1}{R_3}\right)=q_1 \left(\frac{1}{R_1}-\frac{1}{R_2}\right)[/tex]
Solving,
[tex]q_1=\frac{Q\left(\frac{1}{R_2}-\frac{1}{R_3}\right)}{\left(\frac{1}{R_1}-\frac{1}{R_3}\right)}[/tex]

Do I need to use ##Q-q_1## and the potential at the surface of the middle sphere in the equation ##Q=C_{self}V##?
 
  • #25
You have q1, and can plug that into any equation for V(R2). The charge of the middle sphere is Q. q1 and Q-q1 are the surface charges.

ehild
 
  • #26
ehild said:
You have q1, and can plug that into any equation for V(R2). The charge of the middle sphere is Q. q1 and Q-q1 are the surface charges.

ehild

[tex]C_{self}=\frac{Q}{V(R_2)}[/tex]
[tex]=\frac{Q}{V(R_2)}=\frac{Q}{kq_1 \left(\frac{1}{R_1}-\frac{1}{R_2}\right)}[/tex]

Should I substitute the value of ##q_1## in this expression?
 
  • #27
Yes. It is not THAT terrible:biggrin:
 
  • #28
ehild said:
Yes. It is not THAT terrible:biggrin:

I plugged in the values and got 13.5*10^8 but this is wrong. :(
 
  • #29
What is your formula for Cself? Have you plugged in k?
 
Last edited:
  • #30
ehild said:
What is your formula for Cself?

I posted it above in one of my post. :-)

Oops, I guess I realized my mistake.
 
  • #31
Pranav-Arora said:
I posted it above in one of my post. :-)

You mean you wrote up Cself in terms of R1, R2, R3 long ago, you just let me work in vain? Good by, Pranav...
 
  • #32
ehild said:
You mean you wrote up Cself in terms of R1, R2, R3 long ago, you just let me work in vain? Good by, Pranav...

Did I say something wrong? :frown:

[tex]V(R_2)=kq_1 \left(\frac{1}{R_1}-\frac{1}{R_2}\right)[/tex]
##R_1=10 cm, R_2=30 cm, R_3=40 cm##
Using the expression posted above for ##q_1##
[tex]q_1=Q\frac{R_1(R_3-R_2)}{R_2(R_3-R_1)}[/tex]
[tex]q_1=Q\frac{10 \times 10}{30 \times 30}[/tex]
[tex]q_1=\frac{Q}{9}[/tex]

Using this in ##V(R_2)##
[tex]V=k \frac{Q}{9} \cdot \frac{R_2-R_1}{R_1 R_2}[/tex]
[tex]V=9 \times 10^9 \times \frac{Q}{9} \times \frac{20 \times 100}{10 \times 30}[/tex]
Solving.
[tex]V(R_2)=\frac{20 \times 10^9 Q}{3}[/tex]

[tex]C_{self}=\frac{Q}{V(R_2)}[/tex]
[tex]C_{self}=\frac{3Q}{20 \times 10^9 Q}[/tex]
Solving this, I get ##1.5 \times 10^{-10}##
Is this correct?
 
  • #33
yes.

It is equal the the parallel resultant of two spherical shell capacitors.

ehild
 
  • #34
ehild said:
yes.
It is equal the the parallel resultant of two spherical shell capacitors.

Thanks a lot ehild! :smile:

But why the self capacitance is equal to the parallel combination here? :confused:
 
  • #35
I can not read the mind of your teacher, why he/she called the thing "self" capacitance. Anyway, you had something carrying charge and having some potential with respect to the ground, which was proportional to the charge. So it had capacitance C=Q/V.
ehild
 
<h2> How do you calculate the self capacitance of an isolated sphere?</h2><p>The self capacitance of an isolated sphere can be calculated using the formula C = 4πε0r, where C is the capacitance, ε0 is the permittivity of free space, and r is the radius of the sphere.</p><h2> What is the significance of calculating the self capacitance of an isolated sphere?</h2><p>Calculating the self capacitance of an isolated sphere is important in understanding the electrical properties of spherical objects. It can also be used in designing and analyzing electrical systems and devices.</p><h2> Can the self capacitance of an isolated sphere be negative?</h2><p>No, the self capacitance of an isolated sphere cannot be negative. It is a physical property that represents the ability of an object to store electrical charge.</p><h2> How does the radius of the sphere affect its self capacitance?</h2><p>The self capacitance of an isolated sphere is directly proportional to its radius. This means that as the radius increases, the self capacitance also increases.</p><h2> Is the self capacitance of an isolated sphere affected by the material it is made of?</h2><p>Yes, the self capacitance of an isolated sphere is affected by the material it is made of. This is because different materials have different permittivity values, which are used in the calculation of self capacitance.</p>

FAQ: Calculating Self Capacitance of an Isolated Sphere

How do you calculate the self capacitance of an isolated sphere?

The self capacitance of an isolated sphere can be calculated using the formula C = 4πε0r, where C is the capacitance, ε0 is the permittivity of free space, and r is the radius of the sphere.

What is the significance of calculating the self capacitance of an isolated sphere?

Calculating the self capacitance of an isolated sphere is important in understanding the electrical properties of spherical objects. It can also be used in designing and analyzing electrical systems and devices.

Can the self capacitance of an isolated sphere be negative?

No, the self capacitance of an isolated sphere cannot be negative. It is a physical property that represents the ability of an object to store electrical charge.

How does the radius of the sphere affect its self capacitance?

The self capacitance of an isolated sphere is directly proportional to its radius. This means that as the radius increases, the self capacitance also increases.

Is the self capacitance of an isolated sphere affected by the material it is made of?

Yes, the self capacitance of an isolated sphere is affected by the material it is made of. This is because different materials have different permittivity values, which are used in the calculation of self capacitance.

Back
Top