Calculating the distance to turn off the highway

  • Thread starter Pushoam
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Irodov
In summary: So, I think there is something wrong in the following step.In summary, while writing "Speed in the field = η v" I should add η<1 i.e.Speed in the field = η v, η<1.
  • #1
Pushoam
962
52

Homework Statement


upload_2017-7-18_20-32-37.png


upload_2017-7-18_20-33-51.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Speed on a highway = v
Speed in the field = η v, is this what is meant by η times smaller?

Let's denote CD by x.

Now, time taken is
t = (AD - x )/v + {√(x2 + l2)}/ ηv

For time to be extreme,

dt/dx = 0
-1/v + (1/ η v ) [( 1/2 ) * 2x / (√(x2 + l2)) ] = 0

x = l √(n/(1-η) )

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Pushoam said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 207361

View attachment 207362

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Speed on a highway = v
Speed in the field = η v, is this what is meant by η times smaller?

Let's denote CD by x.

Now, time taken is
t = (AD - x )/v + {√(x2 + l2)}/ ηv

For time to be extreme,

dt/dx = 0
-1/v + (1/ η v ) [( 1/2 ) * 2x / (√(x2 + l2)) ] = 0
correct so far
Pushoam said:
x = l √(n/(1-η) )

Is this correct?

No, this is not correct. What is n?
 
  • #3
ehild said:
What is n?
Sorry for typing mistake,

n is nothing but η i.e. ita.
 
  • #4
Pushoam said:
Sorry for typing mistake,

n is nothing but η i.e. ita.
Still not correct.
 
  • #5
-1/v + (1/ η v ) [( 1/2 ) * 2x / (√(x2 + l2)) ] = 0
η = x / (√(x2 + l2))

Squaring both sides gives,
η2( x2 + l2) = x2
x = η l / √(1-η2)

Is this correct?
 
  • #6
@Pushoam, yes, that is correct, assuming η<1.
(It is possible that the author meant for η>1 in which case the speed in the field is actually v/η. If this is the case though, you don't need to resolve the problem; just replace all your η with 1/η.)

I think it is meant that way, because if "something moves 5 times slower" that means it moves at 1/5 the speed, so if "something moves η times slower" I would think it means it moves at 1/η times the speed.
 
  • #7
Pushoam said:
-1/v + (1/ η v ) [( 1/2 ) * 2x / (√(x2 + l2)) ] = 0
η = x / (√(x2 + l2))

Squaring both sides gives,
η2( x2 + l2) = x2
x = η l / √(1-η2)

Is this correct?
Yes, good work!
 
  • #8
ehild said:
Yes, good work!
But , irodov gives x = l / √(η2 - 1).

So, I think there is something wrong in
Pushoam said:
Speed in the field = η v, is this what is meant by η times smaller?
 
  • #9
ehild said:
Yes, good work!
But, Irodov says,
x = l / √(η2 - 1)

Is there anything wrong in the following step ?
Pushoam said:
Speed in the field = η v, is this what is meant by η times smaller?
 
  • #10
Pushoam said:
So, I think there is something wrong in
Yes there are two ways to interpret the statement, "moves η times slower." The two interpretations depend on whether η>1 or η<1.

If you assume η<1 then "η times slower than v" means "ηv"
If you assume η>1 then "η times slower than v" means "v/η"

As I said earlier, you don't need to re-solve the problem if you assume the wrong meaning. Just observe that you effectively have the η.in.your.equation=(1/η.in.their.equation). In other words, you can just replace all η with (1/η) in your final equation and it will be as if you started with "field-speed = v/η" instead of "field-speed = ηv"

Now you know that if this author says "k times smaller than x" he means [x/k with k>1] and not [kx with k<1]

Which way is meant is just a convention; it won't affect any physical results.
 
  • #11
Hiero said:
Now you know that if this author says "k times smaller than x" he means [x/k with k>1] and not [kx with k<1]
Thanks for pointing out this.

So, while writing "Speed in the field = η v" I should add η<1 i.e.
Speed in the field = η v, η<1.
 
  • #12
Pushoam said:
So, while writing "Speed in the field = η v" I should add η<1 i.e.
Speed in the field = η v, η<1.
Yes that would be a more proper way to do it. You said this is the quoted answer:
Pushoam said:
But, Irodov says,
x = l / √(η2 - 1)
Notice what happens when η<1... the expression is imaginary!
Since his result is only sensible for η>1, he must have meant η the other way than you assumed.
 
  • Like
Likes Pushoam

FAQ: Calculating the distance to turn off the highway

How do you calculate the distance to turn off the highway?

To calculate the distance to turn off the highway, you will need to know your current location, the location of the highway exit, and the scale of the map you are using. The distance can be calculated using a variety of methods, such as using a ruler or measuring tool on a map, using a GPS device, or using online mapping tools.

What factors affect the distance to turn off the highway?

The distance to turn off the highway can be affected by various factors such as the speed of your vehicle, the road conditions, and the type of vehicle you are driving. Additionally, the number of lanes on the highway and the amount of traffic can also impact the distance to turn off.

Can I use the same method to calculate the distance to turn off any highway?

The method used to calculate the distance to turn off the highway can vary depending on the type of map or device being used. However, the basic principles of measuring distance and determining your current location and the location of the exit will remain the same for most methods.

Is there a standard distance to turn off the highway?

The distance to turn off the highway can vary depending on the location and design of the highway. Some exits may be closer together, while others may be farther apart. Additionally, the distance may also depend on the type of road or highway, such as a freeway or a local street.

How accurate are the distance calculations to turn off the highway?

The accuracy of the distance calculations to turn off the highway can vary depending on the method used and the quality of the map or device being used. Generally, online mapping tools and GPS devices tend to be more accurate than manually measuring on a map. However, it is always a good idea to double-check the distance using multiple methods to ensure accuracy.

Back
Top