Calculating the Force of Moving Water: Vehicle Hydrodynamic Drag Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ideologue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Water
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the force of moving water on a vehicle driving upstream, the key parameters include water depth, speed, density, and the submerged surface area of the vehicle. The equation F = Apv^2 is suggested, where p represents water density, v is water velocity, and A is the surface area. There is a discussion on whether the same aerodynamic drag equation can be applied to hydrodynamic drag by substituting air density with water density while keeping the coefficient of drag the same. The aerodynamic drag formula is provided as F = 0.5PV²Cdf, emphasizing that the coefficient of drag must be specific to the vehicle's interaction with water. This approach could provide a theoretical framework for understanding the resistive forces encountered by vehicles in moving water.
Ideologue
21
0
Does anyone know of an equation I may use to calculate the force of moving water? I am trying to theoretically workout the resistive force a vehicle would meet if it were to drive upstream (hydrodynamic drag).

I am assuming the main parameters such an equation would include are water depth, water speed, water density and the surface area of the exposed parts of the vehicle such as the portion of its tyres submerged in the stream.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Force=v*rate of change of mass
F=Apv^2, where p = density of water, v=velocity of water, A=surface area
 
Thank you very much, Harmony.
 
I am wondering now if it is possible to use exactly the same equation for calculating aerodynamic drag as is used for calculating hydrodynamic drag?

Instead of using a figure for air density, a figure for water density is employed. The coefficient of drag remains the same.

What do you think?

Aerodynamic drag is: F = 0.5PV²Cdf

Where:

P = air density
V = velocity
Cd = coefficient of drag
f = frontal areaEdit: Of course the coefficient of drag would be specific to the part of the vehicle subjected to the flowing water.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term (1) one may derivate (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top