Calculating the Landing Positions of Two Cubes on a Frictionless Incline

In summary, the problem involves finding the distance two cubes, one with half the mass of the other, will land after the smaller cube slides down a frictionless incline and elastically collides with the larger cube at the bottom. The height of the incline and the position of the table are given. To solve the problem, conservation of momentum and conservation of energy equations are used to find the speeds of both cubes after the collision. Once the speeds are known, the equations of motion can be used to calculate the distance each cube will travel from the table.
  • #1
Maskkkk
7
0
Say I was wondering if I could maybe get some help with this problem.


In a physics lab, a small cude slides down a frictionless incline as shown in the figure below, and elastically strikes a cude at the bottom that is only one-half its mass. If the incline is 30 cm high and the table is 90 cm off the floor, where does each cube land?

So basically they're asking how far does mass 1 and mass 2 land from the bottom of the table.

But I don't really get it...

Thank you in advance,
Andrew J. Leer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Since you didn't include the "figure below", I assume that the second cube is at the edge of a 90 cm table.

You are told the height of the incline so you can calculate the potential energy of the first cube relative to the bottom of the incline. That is the same as its kinetic energy at the bottom so you can find its speed and thus know both kinetic energy and momentum and, using conservation of each, can find the speed (which will be horizontal for both) of the both cubes after the collision. Knowing that, you can find the equations of motion of both cubes. Determine the time until they hit the ground and use that to find the distance they move from the table.
 
  • #3
I solved for the speed of the first block just before it hits the second block, and this came out to be:

the square root of 2gh,

Where h is the height of the incline.
I assigned this to a varible called V_1.

Next I tried to solve for the speed of the blocks after they collide,
using the conservation of momentum equation (Detla P=0).

When I'm done I get:

V_2' = (m_1(v_1-v_1'))/(m_2)

(for the second block)

Next when I try to use V_2' (after solving for time in the air) in the equation which solves for Delta X_2:

I.E.

DX_2 = V_2' * t

DX_2 = (m_1(v_1-v_1'))/(m_2) * t

DX_2 = (m_1(v_1-v_1'))/(0.5*m_1) * t

DX_2 = ((v_1-v_1'))/(0.5) * t


But when I plug it into the equation and try to solve for it I'm still left with the unknown varible V_1' (as shown above).

I also tried solving for V_1' and it's equation as the varible V_2 in it, so that doesn't work either.

What do I do from here?

Thanks again,
Maskkkk
 
  • #4
first find both speeds

Maskkkk said:
I solved for the speed of the first block just before it hits the second block, and this came out to be:

the square root of 2gh,

Where h is the height of the incline.
I assigned this to a varible called V_1.
Right.
Next I tried to solve for the speed of the blocks after they collide,
using the conservation of momentum equation (Detla P=0).

When I'm done I get:
As HallsofIvy stated, you need to use both conservation of momentum and conservation of energy to find the speed of each block after the collision. When you're done you will know both v_1' and v_2' in terms of v_1.

Then you'll be able to find how far they travel.
 
  • #5
Well actually I solved for them both, but I was too lazy to write the other one up here.

But the problem I'm having is that both v_1 and v_2 are unknowns, and are within each other's equations when I solve for them.

So when I plugin one for the other I wind up with a situation where I cannot solve for either.
 
  • #6
two equations, two unknowns: solve it!

Maskkkk said:
Well actually I solved for them both, but I was too lazy to write the other one up here.

But the problem I'm having is that both v_1 and v_2 are unknowns, and are within each other's equations when I solve for them.
If they are still "unknown" after you solve for them, then you didn't really solve for them, right? :smile:

You should have two equations with two unkowns. Once you solve them, you will know the speeds of both blocks. Start by writing both of those equations. (Don't waste time trying to solve for the distance until you've figured out how to solve for v_1' and v_2'.)
 
  • #7
Step 1: Just mass 1 sliding down the incline to the point
just before it hits.

[tex]&v_{1}=?$&[/tex]

[tex]\Delta K_{E}+\Delta P_{E}=W_{NC}[/tex]

[tex](K_{E1}-K_{E0})+(P_{E1}-P_{E0})=0[/tex]

[tex](K_{E1}-P_{E0})=0[/tex]

[tex]K_{E1}=P_{E0}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{2}m_{1}v_{1}^{2}=m_{1}gh[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{2}v_{1}^{2}=gh[/tex]

[tex]v_{1}=\sqrt{2gh}[/tex]



Step 2:
Figure out the momentum, by relating the before hitting
and after hitting together.

[tex](P_{2}^{~}+P_{1}^{~})-(P_{2}+P_{1})=0[/tex]

[tex](m_{2}v_{2}^{~}+m_{1}v_{1}^{~})-(m_{2}v_{2}+m_{1}v_{1})=0[/tex]

[tex](m_{2}v_{2}^{~}+m_{1}v_{1}^{~})-(m_{1}v_{1})=0[/tex]

[tex]m_{2}v_{2}^{~}+m_{1}v_{1}^{~}-m_{1}v_{1}=0[/tex]

[tex]m_{2}v_{2}^{~}=m_{1}v_{1}-m_{1}v_{1}^{~}[/tex]

[tex]m_{2}v_{2}^{~}=m_{1}(v_{1}-v_{1}^{~})[/tex]

[tex]v_{2}^{~}=\frac{m_{1}(v_{1}-v_{1}^{~})}{m_{2}}[/tex]




Step 3: The blocks fall, and we need to determine how far
in the x direction they will fall.

Solve for: [tex]\Delta X_{1}[/tex]

[tex]\Delta X_{1}=v_{1}^{~}t+\frac{1}{2}a_{x}t^{2}[/tex]

[tex]\Delta X_{1}=v_{1}^{~}t[/tex]

[tex]t=?[/tex]

[tex]\Delta Y=v_{1}t+\frac{1}{2}a_{y}t^{2}[/tex]

[tex]\Delta Y=\frac{1}{2}a_{y}t^{2}[/tex]

[tex]-H=-\frac{1}{2}gt^{2}[/tex]

[tex]H=\frac{1}{2}gt^{2}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{\frac{2H}{g}}=t[/tex]

[tex]\Delta X_{1}=v_{1}^{~}(\sqrt{\frac{2H}{g}})[/tex]

[tex]\Delta X_{1}=(v_{1}-\frac{1}{2}v_{2}^{~})(\sqrt{\frac{2H}{g}})[/tex]

[tex]\Delta X_{1}=(v_{1}-\frac{2(v_{1}-v_{1}^{~})}{2})(\sqrt{\frac{2H}{g}})[/tex]

[tex]\Delta X_{1}=(v_{1}-(v_{1}-v_{1}^{~}))(\sqrt{\frac{2H}{g}})[/tex]

And right about here is where it doesn't make any sense, because I keep getting the same varible I plugged in for back again.

If what I wrote here doesn't make sense, please download what I did so far in lyx format, it's in a tar.gz archive on my space at http://home.pct.edu/~leeand00/ I just put it up there it's the only file there is on the entire page.

Thank you,
Andrew J. Leer
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
Maskkkk said:
[tex]v_{1}=\sqrt{2gh}[/tex]

Nothing wrong with step 1.

Step 2:
Figure out the momentum, by relating the before hitting
and after hitting together.
One more time: you need to apply both conservation of momentum and conservation of energy in order to solve for the speeds after the collision:
(1) [tex]m_1v_1 = m_1v_1' + m_2 v_2'[/tex]
(2) [tex]1/2 m_1 v_1^2 = 1/2m_1v_1'^2 + 1/2m_2v_2'^2[/tex]

You know v_1 from step one, and you know that [itex]m_2 = m_1/2[/itex]. So solve for v_1' and v_2'.
Step 3: The blocks fall, and we need to determine how far
in the x direction they will fall.
Don't waste time with step 3 until you complete step 2.
 
  • #9
Okay now I tried to solve for Momentum and Potental Energy, just to get to the equations that you are at.

Conservation of Momentum, no problem, came up to the same place that you are.

Conservation of Energy on the other hand...I don't understand.

Part 2: Conservation of Energy:

Okay as I understand it, the energy before the collision is equal to the energy after the collision,
thus:

[tex]\Delta K_{E}+\Delta P_{E}=\Delta K_{E}^{'}+\Delta P_{E}^{'}[/tex]

[tex](K_{E2}-K_{E1})+(P_{E2}-P_{E1})=(K_{E2}^{'}-K_{E1}^{'})+(P_{E2}^{~}-P_{E1}^{'})[/tex]

The potental energy before the collision is equal to zero since the bottom of the incline is our 0 potental energy point. I'm not sure about the potental energy after the collision, but my guess would be that it too is set to zero since immediately after the collision both blocks only have a horizontal component of velocity. Also since block 2 is at rest before the collision it has not kinetic energy And so...
[tex]K_{E1}=K_{E2}^{'}-K_{E1}^{'}[/tex]

The only part I don't understand is, where does the plus in your (beginning of the equation) come from, since I get:
[tex]\frac{1}{2}m_{1}v_{1}^{2}=\frac{1}{2}m_{2}v_{2}^{'2}-\frac{1}{2}m_{1}v_{1}^{'2}[/tex]

and you get:

[tex]\frac{1}{2}m_{1}v_{1}^{2}=\frac{1}{2}m_{1}v_{1}^{'2}+\frac{1}{2}m_{2}v_{2}^{'2}[/tex]
 
  • #10
Maskkkk said:
Conservation of Energy on the other hand...I don't understand.

Part 2: Conservation of Energy:

Okay as I understand it, the energy before the collision is equal to the energy after the collision,
thus:

[tex]\Delta K_{E}+\Delta P_{E}=\Delta K_{E}^{'}+\Delta P_{E}^{'}[/tex]
I'm not sure what you are trying to write. Conservation of energy says:
[tex]\Delta {KE} + \Delta {PE} = 0[/tex]

Since during the collision [itex]\Delta {PE} = 0[/itex], we can drop that term. (The collision takes place at a single height.) So:
[tex]\Delta {KE} = 0[/tex]

The only part I don't understand is, where does the plus in your (beginning of the equation) come from, since I get:
[tex]\frac{1}{2}m_{1}v_{1}^{2}=\frac{1}{2}m_{2}v_{2}^{'2}-\frac{1}{2}m_{1}v_{1}^{'2}[/tex]

and you get:

[tex]\frac{1}{2}m_{1}v_{1}^{2}=\frac{1}{2}m_{1}v_{1}^{'2}+\frac{1}{2}m_{2}v_{2}^{'2}[/tex]
You messed up your statement of conservation of energy, which led you to an incorrect expression. Conservation of energy says that the kinetic energy before the collision (left side of my equation) must equal the kinetic energy after the collision (right side of my equation).

Let me know if that makes sense to you.
 
  • #11
Thanks!

That did the trick thanks Doc!
 

FAQ: Calculating the Landing Positions of Two Cubes on a Frictionless Incline

What is the Small Cube Momentum Problem?

The Small Cube Momentum Problem is a physics problem that involves calculating the momentum of a small cube moving in a straight line. It is typically used as an introductory problem to help students understand the concept of momentum and its relation to mass and velocity.

How do you solve the Small Cube Momentum Problem?

To solve the Small Cube Momentum Problem, you need to use the formula p = mv, where p is the momentum, m is the mass, and v is the velocity of the cube. You also need to make sure you are using consistent units for mass and velocity (e.g. kg for mass and m/s for velocity).

What is the importance of the Small Cube Momentum Problem?

The Small Cube Momentum Problem is important because it helps students understand the basic principles of momentum, which is a fundamental concept in physics. It also serves as a foundation for more complex problems involving momentum and collisions.

Can the Small Cube Momentum Problem be applied in real-life situations?

Yes, the Small Cube Momentum Problem can be applied in real-life situations. For example, it can be used to calculate the momentum of a moving object, such as a car, in a collision. It can also be used in engineering to design safer cars and other structures that can withstand collisions.

Are there any variations of the Small Cube Momentum Problem?

Yes, there are variations of the Small Cube Momentum Problem that involve different scenarios, such as an elastic or inelastic collision between two objects. These variations can provide a deeper understanding of momentum and its applications in different situations.

Back
Top