Calculating Travel Time of Proton Across Galaxy Using Special Relativity

In summary, the galaxy is about 10^5 light years across and the most energetic cosmic rays known have energies of the order of 10^19 eV. The time it would take for a proton with this energy to cross the galaxy is approximately 4.93 minutes in the proton's rest frame and 10^5 years in the galaxy's rest frame. The Lorentz transform can be used to calculate this time, but it is important to be accurate with the values used. Converting all values to meters/seconds can help with accuracy. Additionally, it is important to use the exact mass of the proton and consider the ratio of 4.96/4.93 in order to get a more precise answer.
  • #1
bon
559
0
Special Relativity URGENT!

Homework Statement



The galaxy is about 10^5 light years across and the most energetic cosmic rays known have energies of the order of 10^19 eV. How long would it take a proton with this energy to cross the Galaxy as measured in the rest frame of (i) the galaxy (ii) the proton

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So I've done (i) and got the right answer (10^5 years) since to the best accuracy of my calculator, the particle is traveling at the speed of light...

For part (ii) I want to use lorentz transform, but i can't seem to get my calculator to take the accuracy..

basically: ct' = gamma(ct-Bx) where B is v rel..

now i found gamma to be (1.06699... x 10^10) which means B is root(1 - 8.798...x10^-21)
now on my calculator this gives a value of B of 1, which obviously means t' = 0...The actual answer gives t' as just over 4 minutes...

I'm wondering if there is another way to work out t'..how can i compute it to get the answer required!?

THANKS :) !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


bon said:
For part (ii) I want to use lorentz transform, but i can't seem to get my calculator to take the accuracy..
Hint: From the proton's frame, what's the distance across the galaxy? (All you need is gamma.)


(Don't give all your threads the same title! :smile:)
 
  • #3


Are you making sure to convert the distance in light years to meters & standardizing your units?
 
  • #4


Chewy0087 said:
Are you making sure to convert the distance in light years to meters & standardizing your units?

You shouldn't need to convert it all to meteres..
 
  • #5


Doc Al said:
Hint: From the proton's frame, what's the distance across the galaxy? (All you need is gamma.)


(Don't give all your threads the same title! :smile:)

Ok so x' = x/gamma, but then how do i work out t', because v' = 0? since it is in the rest frame of the proton...

also, was i right in using e = Mc^2/gamma for the first part, rather than E^2 = m^2 c^4 + p^2 m^2??

When do i know when to use the former and when to use the latter?
 
  • #6


anyone?
 
  • #7


bon said:
Ok so x' = x/gamma, but then how do i work out t', because v' = 0? since it is in the rest frame of the proton...
In the proton's frame it's the galaxy that is moving.

also, was i right in using e = Mc^2/gamma for the first part, rather than E^2 = m^2 c^4 + p^2 m^2??
I'd use KE = mc^2(gamma - 1).

When do i know when to use the former and when to use the latter?
It's just a matter of convenience.
 
  • #8


Doc Al said:
I'd use KE = mc^2(gamma - 1).

Shouldn't it come to the same though?

And how can you use this? You aren't told its KE, you are told its total E..

Also, surely by doing it your way with x', you encounter the same problem since v(rel) is the same value i couldn't work out accurately enough previously...

for this reason, my answer turns out to be 4.93mins, when it should be 4.96 mins..

how can I get 4.96 mins?

thanks again for your help..
 
  • #9


Did you use the exact mass of the proton?

Anyway, the problem says that the energy is of the order of 10^19 eV. So, I would not even bother to get the last decimal correct. I would solve this problem as follows. I would not bother looking up the precise mass of the proton, as I already know that it is of the order of one GeV.

Whether the 10^19 eV is supposed to be the total energy or just the inetic energy is irrelevant. I can already tell that the gamma factor is of the order of 10^10. And that then means that the proper time for the proton is 10^(-5) years = 0.00365 days (including extra decimals for clarity). Converting to hours is easy if you use that 24 is of the order of 25 and 25*4 = 100. So we find that the proper time is about 0.36/4 hours = 0.09 hours = of the order of 5 minutes.
 
  • #10


Count Iblis said:
Did you use the exact mass of the proton?

Anyway, the problem says that the energy is of the order of 10^19 eV. So, I would not even bother to get the last decimal correct. I would solve this problem as follows. I would not bother looking up the precise mass of the proton, as I already know that it is of the order of one GeV.

Whether the 10^19 eV is supposed to be the total energy or just the inetic energy is irrelevant. I can already tell that the gamma factor is of the order of 10^10. And that then means that the proper time for the proton is 10^(-5) years = 0.00365 days (including extra decimals for clarity). Converting to hours is easy if you use that 24 is of the order of 25 and 25*4 = 100. So we find that the proper time is about 0.36/4 hours = 0.09 hours = of the order of 5 minutes.

Okay thanks - useful to see, but unfortunately not what I've been asked to do.
 
  • #11


bon said:
You shouldn't need to convert it all to meteres..

I know you don't need to but if you convert everything into metres/seconds it's a lot more structured and quicker overall.

your answer is extremeley close given the huge inaccuracies, check the mass of the proton to another significant figure maybe, also did you use 365 or 365.25 for number of days in a year? on second thought that wouldn't make much difference at all really, perhaps your value for gamma is on the short side...
 
Last edited:
  • #12


I also find 4.93 minutes using the exact proton mass and 365.26 days/year. To answer your question "how can I get 4.96 mins", you have to go beyond special relativity and apply some simple logic.

Consider the ratio: 4.96/4.93 = 1.006

If you take the proton mass you used and multiply that with 1.006, you get the desired answer.

The proton mass is 1.67262158 × 10^(-27) kg

Multiplying by 1.006 gives:

1.68 × 10^(-27) kg

The neutron mass is:

1.67492729 × 10^(-27) kg

We see that the mass equals the neutron mass to almost 3 significant figures. The fact that the proper time of 5 minutes is less than the neutron's half life suggests to me that the person who formulated the problem originally formulated it in terms of neutrons, perhaps asking if the neutron could cross the galaxy. He could have changed his mind (perhaps because asking that already gives away the clue that the proper time would be very small) but forgot to replace the neutron mass by the proton mass.
 
  • #13


bon said:
Shouldn't it come to the same though?

And how can you use this? You aren't told its KE, you are told its total E..
When they tell you the energy of some particle, usually they are talking about its KE. But to the accuracy you need, it doesn't matter.

Also, surely by doing it your way with x', you encounter the same problem since v(rel) is the same value i couldn't work out accurately enough previously...
The answer is, of course, close enough to c that it doesn't matter for calculating the time of travel. If, for some reason, you wanted to find a more accurate value for the speed, rather than calculate it directly, calculate its difference from c. Replace beta with β = 1 - x, where x << 1. Then you can find x given gamma. You'll find x to be so small that using c is good enough.

for this reason, my answer turns out to be 4.93mins, when it should be 4.96 mins..

how can I get 4.96 mins?
Beats me. Perhaps they used a different value for the rest mass of the proton. Regardless, your answer is well within the accuracy of your data.

What textbook are you using?
 

FAQ: Calculating Travel Time of Proton Across Galaxy Using Special Relativity

How is the travel time of a proton across the galaxy calculated using special relativity?

The travel time of a proton across the galaxy can be calculated using the equation t = d/v, where t is the travel time, d is the distance traveled, and v is the velocity of the proton. In special relativity, the velocity of an object is affected by its mass and energy, so a more accurate calculation would also consider the proton's mass and the energy of the environment it is traveling through.

What is the significance of special relativity in calculating travel time?

Special relativity is a theory developed by Albert Einstein that explains how space and time are relative and can be affected by factors such as mass and energy. It is important in calculating travel time because it allows for more accurate predictions of the time it takes for objects to travel across large distances, taking into account the effects of relativity on their velocity.

How does the speed of light factor into the calculation of travel time using special relativity?

The speed of light, denoted by the letter c, is a fundamental constant in special relativity. According to Einstein's theory, the speed of light is the maximum speed at which any object can travel in the universe. This means that when calculating travel time using special relativity, the velocity of the object cannot exceed the speed of light.

Are there any limitations to using special relativity to calculate travel time across the galaxy?

While special relativity is a very accurate theory, it does have limitations when it comes to calculating travel time across the galaxy. For example, it does not take into account the effects of gravity, which can also impact the velocity of objects. Additionally, special relativity is based on the assumption that the universe is isotropic and homogeneous, which may not be the case on a large scale.

How does the calculation of travel time using special relativity differ from classical mechanics?

In classical mechanics, the laws of motion are based on the assumption that time and space are absolute and independent of each other. This means that the calculation of travel time does not take into account factors such as the velocity of the object or its mass. In contrast, special relativity takes into account the effects of space and time on an object's velocity, resulting in a more accurate calculation of travel time.

Similar threads

Back
Top