Calculating Velocity & Kinetic Energy of Bicycle Racer Rolling Downhill

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigtymer8700
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rolling
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the final velocity and kinetic energy of a bicycle racer after losing a wheel while rolling downhill. The initial conditions include a speed of 11.0 m/s, a wheel mass of 2.25 kg, and a height of 75.0 m. The kinetic energy formula used is Kf = 1/2Mv^2 + 1/2(I)w^2, with the moment of inertia calculated as I = MR^2. The user attempts to apply energy conservation principles, calculating initial kinetic energy (Ki) and potential energy (Ui), and is trying to determine the final velocity (Vf) at the bottom of the hill. The calculations lead to a final velocity of 38.8 m/s, but there are uncertainties regarding the angular velocity (w) calculation.
bigtymer8700
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
A bicycle racer is going downhill at 11.0m/s when, to his horror, one of his 2.25kg wheels comes off when he is 75.0m above the foot of the hill. We can model the wheel as a thin-walled cylinder 85.0cm in diameter and neglect the small mass of the spokes.

I need to get the velocity at the bottom of the hill and KEtotal at the bottom

I know Kf=1/2Mv^2 + 1/2(I)w^2

Vo=11m/s
M=2.25kg
r=.425m

I know I=MR^2
I=.4064kg*m^2

would you use Ki+Ui=Kf+Uf to get w? or is there another way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that looks correct.
 
here was my attempt
Ki=136.125J
Ui=1653.75J
Kf=1/2mv^2+ 1/2Iw^2
Uf=0

for I am stuck on Kf
Its a thin cylinder so I=MR^2 for w did i calculate it correct? v=wr so 11/.425= 25.8rad/s
Ki +Ui=Kf + Uf
so 136.125J +1653.75J= 1/2mv^2 + .4064*(25.8)^2 +0

from here i solved for the v i plugged in 2.25kg into m and i got 38.8m/s as Vf
 
am i messing up on calculating the ang velocity (w)?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K