Calculation of moment of inertia of cylindrical surface

  • #1
zenterix
702
84
Homework Statement
(Apostol, Vol II, 2nd Ed., Chapter. 12.10, Problem 10)
A homogenous paper rectange of base ##2\pi a## and altitude ##h## is rolled to form a circular cylindrical surface ##S## of radius ##a##. Calculate the moment of inertia of ##S## about an axis through a diameter of the circular base.
Relevant Equations
##I=\int\int_S r^2 dm##
Here is the homogenous paper rectangle

1698944078473.png


And if we roll it we get a cylinder with base radius ##a##.

It is not clear to me what "an axis through a diameter of the circular base means".

Let's imagine such as axis is ##\alpha## in the following figure

1698943063059.jpeg


Then we have

$$I_{\alpha}=\int_0^h\int_0^{2\pi} z^2 \cdot \frac{M}{4\pi a^2}ad\theta dz = \frac{Mh^3}{6a}\tag{1}$$

where I have used a mass density of ##\frac{M}{4\pi a^2}## for the cylindrical surface.

Now, technically, if we were to use the following axis instead

1698943593848.png


then it also "passes through" a diameter of the circular base. In this case we have

$$I_{\alpha}=\int_0^h\int_0^{2\pi} a^2\cdot \frac{M}{4\pi a^2} a d\theta dz=\frac{Mah}{2}$$

Neither one of these calculations matches the answer at the end of the book, which is ##\pi a^3h+\frac{2}{3}\pi ah^3##.

What am I doing wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi,

Looking at your equation (1), it seems to me you have ##r=z##, independent of ##\theta##. That can't be right.

Looking at the book answer, it seems they assume ##\rho = 1##.

For a hoop about a central diameter, here I find ##I={1\over 2} Mr^2##.
(which also can be found with the perpendicular axis theorem -- see below)

With ##r=a## and ##M = 2\pi a h\rho## that reproduces the first term in the book solution.

(**)
The parallel axis theorem would add a second term for which I can't reproduce the book value :frown: .
(a naive ##I = I_{cm} + Md^2## with ##d = {h\over 2} ## gets me ##{1\over 2} \pi a h^3##)

I tink the answer lies here :

Hoop about diameter:$$dI_z = dI_x+dI_y\ \ \& \ \ dI_x=dI_y \Rightarrow dI_x = {1\over 2} dI_z = {1\over 2} dm R^2$$

Hoop about parallel axis at distance z:$$dI_x = {1\over 2} dm R^2 + dm\, z^2$$Integrate and now the second term also agrees with the book.

Bonus points for pointing out what's wrong with (**)
[edit] Earn my own bonus: hoop about diameter expression is for ##h=0##

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes zenterix
  • #3
I believe the first option is what is asked for. What you are missing is that you should multiply the mass elements by the distance to the axis squared, this is not given by ##z^2##. Can you figure out what it should be?

Hint: Your result is correct if ##h \gg a##.
 
  • Like
Likes zenterix
  • #4
BvU said:
Hi,

Looking at your equation (1), it seems to me you have ##r=z##, independent of ##\theta##. That can't be right.

Looking at the book answer, it seems they assume ##\rho = 1##.

For a hoop about a central diameter, here I find ##I={1\over 2} Mr^2##.
(which also can be found with the perpendicular axis theorem -- see below)

With ##r=a## and ##M = 2\pi a h\rho## that reproduces the first term in the book solution.

(**)
The parallel axis theorem would add a second term for which I can't reproduce the book value :frown: .
(a naive ##I = I_{cm} + Md^2## with ##d = {h\over 2} ## gets me ##{1\over 2} \pi a h^3##)

I tink the answer lies here :

Hoop about diameter:$$dI_z = dI_x+dI_y\ \ \& \ \ dI_x=dI_y \Rightarrow dI_x = {1\over 2} dI_z = {1\over 2} dm R^2$$

Hoop about parallel axis at distance z:$$dI_x = {1\over 2} dm R^2 + dm\, z^2$$Integrate and now the second term also agrees with the book.

Bonus points for pointing out what's wrong with (**)
[edit] Earn my own bonus: hoop about diameter expression is for ##h=0##

##\ ##
While you certainly can use the parallel axis theorem, I think the correct integral in itself is pretty straightforward.
 
  • Like
Likes zenterix
  • #5
Orodruin said:
I believe the first option is what is asked for. What you are missing is that you should multiply the mass elements by the distance to the axis squared, this is not given by ##z^2##. Can you figure out what it should be?

Hint: Your result is correct if ##h \gg a##.
Oh, right, silly me.

1698953279207.png


$$I_{\alpha}=\int_0^h\int_0^{2\pi} (a^2\cos^2{\theta}+z^2)\cdot \frac{M}{4\pi a^2}\cdot a d\theta dz$$

$$=\frac{M}{4\pi a^2} \cdot (\pi a^3h +\frac{2}{3}\pi ah^3)$$

If we assume that the density is 1 then the result matches the book.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU

FAQ: Calculation of moment of inertia of cylindrical surface

What is the moment of inertia of a cylindrical surface?

The moment of inertia of a cylindrical surface refers to the measure of an object's resistance to rotational motion about an axis. For a thin cylindrical shell of radius \( R \) and mass \( M \), rotating about its central axis, the moment of inertia is given by \( I = MR^2 \).

How do you calculate the moment of inertia for a hollow cylinder?

To calculate the moment of inertia for a hollow cylinder (thin-walled), you use the formula \( I = MR^2 \), where \( M \) is the mass of the cylinder and \( R \) is the radius. This formula assumes the mass is uniformly distributed along the surface of the cylinder.

What is the difference in the moment of inertia between a solid and a hollow cylinder?

The moment of inertia of a solid cylinder (about its central axis) is given by \( I = \frac{1}{2}MR^2 \), whereas for a hollow cylinder (thin-walled), it is \( I = MR^2 \). The solid cylinder has a lower moment of inertia because its mass is distributed throughout its volume, rather than being concentrated at the surface.

How does the axis of rotation affect the moment of inertia of a cylindrical surface?

The moment of inertia depends significantly on the axis of rotation. For a cylindrical surface rotating about its central axis, the moment of inertia is \( I = MR^2 \). If the axis of rotation is along the diameter (perpendicular to the central axis), the moment of inertia is \( I = \frac{1}{2}MR^2 \). The distribution of mass relative to the axis affects the moment of inertia.

Can the parallel axis theorem be applied to calculate the moment of inertia of a cylindrical surface?

Yes, the parallel axis theorem can be applied to calculate the moment of inertia of a cylindrical surface about any axis parallel to the central axis. The theorem states \( I = I_{cm} + Md^2 \), where \( I_{cm} \) is the moment of inertia about the center of mass axis, \( M \) is the mass, and \( d \) is the distance between the two axes. For a thin cylindrical shell, \( I_{cm} = MR^2 \).

Similar threads

Back
Top