- #1
rdt2
- 125
- 2
I put this question in the 'Calculus' forum but didn't really get a response. Maybe it's a silly question but I thought I'd try here anyway:
Older textbooks on the Calculus of Variations seem to define the first variation of a functional [tex] \Pi [/tex] as:
[tex] \delta \Pi = \Pi(f + \delta f) - \Pi (f) [/tex]
which looks analogous to:
[tex] \delta f = \frac {df} {dx} \delta x = lim_{\delta x \rightarrow 0} (f(x+ \delta x) -f(x)) [/tex]
from differential calculus. However, newer books seem to define the first variation as the Gateaux derivative:
[tex] \left[ \frac {d} {d \epsilon} \Pi (f+ \epsilon h) \right]_{\epsilon = 0 } [/tex]
which looks more like the gradient [tex]\frac {df} {dx} [/tex] than the difference [tex]\delta x [/tex]. Which is the better 'basic' definition?
Older textbooks on the Calculus of Variations seem to define the first variation of a functional [tex] \Pi [/tex] as:
[tex] \delta \Pi = \Pi(f + \delta f) - \Pi (f) [/tex]
which looks analogous to:
[tex] \delta f = \frac {df} {dx} \delta x = lim_{\delta x \rightarrow 0} (f(x+ \delta x) -f(x)) [/tex]
from differential calculus. However, newer books seem to define the first variation as the Gateaux derivative:
[tex] \left[ \frac {d} {d \epsilon} \Pi (f+ \epsilon h) \right]_{\epsilon = 0 } [/tex]
which looks more like the gradient [tex]\frac {df} {dx} [/tex] than the difference [tex]\delta x [/tex]. Which is the better 'basic' definition?