Calculus Calculus Textbook: Courant vs Apostol

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on choosing between Courant and Apostol as calculus textbooks, with a mention of reading Spivak alongside. Participants highlight that both Apostol and Courant are excellent resources, with Courant offering numerous applications and a charming, traditional style, while Apostol is noted for its meticulous approach and strong problem sets. There is a consensus that working through either book provides a solid understanding of calculus. Preferences vary, with some favoring Courant for its engaging style and others leaning toward Apostol for its thoroughness. Overall, both texts are recommended for their quality and effectiveness in teaching calculus.
vibha_ganji
Messages
19
Reaction score
6
Hi! I was looking for a Calculus textbook to buy and was debating between Courant and Apostol. I was planning on reading Spivak parallel to one of these. My question is does Apostol cover more material than Courant does or are they practically the same. Sorry if this has already been asked, I was unable to find the thread.! Thank you so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know the other calculus books, but Courant's book is great. It's worth reading anyway!
 
My preference is Apostol. Truthfully, if you manage to work through most of either one, you will know a lot of calculus. Both are terrific. Courant has plenty of applications. Apostol has good problems.
 
I lean towards Courant, but I know others who prefer Apostol.
 
in my view, all are excellent. courant is old fashioned and charming, spivak is modern and fun, apostol is very meticulous and scholarly.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes Demystifier

Thread '"WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians'

The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
View full post »

Thread 'Books with a more theoretical approach to turbulence and DNS'

I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
View full post »

Similar threads

Calculus Apostol's vol 1 calculus not as good as Stewart's calculus?
Replies
6
Views
5K
Calculus Why "Transition Books (Apostol, Spivak)" are necessary?
Replies
12
Views
7K
Calculus Revisiting Single-Variable Calculus after Multi-
Replies
1
Views
2K
Calculus Advanced Calculus textbooks that are useful for Cal BC
Replies
3
Views
2K
Real Analysis Textbook Recommendation
Replies
2
Views
3K
Seeking Advice on my Plan for Calculus Self-Study Textbooks
Replies
3
Views
3K
Calculus Just got Courant's calculus text -- Need some tips to work through it
Replies
5
Views
2K
Calculus Should I read Spivak's Calculus as an undergrad in theoretical physics?
Replies
2
Views
4K
Should Apostol's calculus be supplemented with Courant/Spivak
Replies
3
Views
8K
Calculus Courant/John vs. Apostol for In-Depth Studying of Calculus?
Replies
4
Views
7K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top