Can a Cube Be Cut into Smaller Cubes of the Same Size?

  • Thread starter MalayInd
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the partitioning of a cube into smaller cubes and the possibility of having no two cubes of the same size. It is shown that this is not possible and the same argument can be applied to the partitioning of a square. However, in the case of the square, it is possible to have a partition with no two squares of the same size, known as 'squared squares'.
  • #1
MalayInd
33
0
:smile:
If a cube is cut into finite number of smaller cubes, prove that at least two of them must be of same size.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Consider the 2 dimensional case. If this is true in 3 dimensions then it works in 2 dimensions too for partitions of a square (a cross section of the cube will be a partition of the square with the same property). Now (under the assumption that a partition exists with no two squares the same size) consider the left side of the square and the smallest square of the partition that touches that side. You know that an edge of this square must be less than half the size of the whole square, or it must be equal to the size of the whole square (why?). Discarding that second case for now because it is a trivial partition, consider the rightmost edge of this smallest square. How can you re-apply the same argument to this edge? Where does re-applying the argument a large number of times lead you?
 
  • #3
I am not sure how to expess this formally.

You must make a last cut to create 2 cubes. The cube faces you create with this last cut must be the same side length. Therefore the cubes are the same size.
 
  • #5
The same type of argument Orthodontist suggested can be applied directly to the cube case. While this argument fails in the case of the square due to what might happen if the smallest square lies on an edge, as shown in the attached picture, it can be shown to still work in the cube case if you show that the smallest square of a tiled square (with all tiles being squares of different sizes) cannot lie on the edge of the square. This can be shown by exhausting a few possibilities.
 

Attachments

  • square.GIF
    square.GIF
    1.3 KB · Views: 545
Last edited:
  • #6
The answer is in rhj23's second link.
 

FAQ: Can a Cube Be Cut into Smaller Cubes of the Same Size?

What is the answer to A Simple Maths Question-1?

The answer is 2.

How did you arrive at the answer for A Simple Maths Question-1?

I arrived at the answer by adding 1 and 1 together, which equals 2.

Is there a specific method or formula for solving A Simple Maths Question-1?

No, this question can be solved by basic addition.

Can you provide an explanation for why the answer to A Simple Maths Question-1 is 2?

The answer is 2 because 1 plus 1 equals 2.

Are there any variations or alternate ways to solve A Simple Maths Question-1?

No, this question can only be solved by adding 1 and 1 together.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top