Can a Point Exist in an Integratable Function Where the Integral Equals Half?

This can be proved using Riemann sums and the fact that the minimum of a sum of positive numbers is always greater than or equal to the sum of the minimum of those numbers.
  • #1
Dethrone
717
0
A function is integratable on [0,1] and that \(\displaystyle f(x)\ge 1 \) for \(\displaystyle 0 \le x\le1\). Show that there must be a point, c, on the interval [0,1] such that \(\displaystyle \int_{0}^{c} f(t)\,dt = \frac{1}{2}\).

Can anyone point me to the right direction as to how to solve this? I.e does it require the IVT, the FTC, etc?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This requires the IVT.
 
  • #3
Just what I didn't want to hear, lol. I haven't done any proofs requiring IVT. Can you start me off?
 
  • #4
Hi Rido12,

Since $f$ is integrable on $[0,1]$, the function

$\displaystyle F(x) = \int_ 0^x f(t)\, dt - \frac{1}{2}$

is continuous on $[0,1]$. Show that $ F (0) < 0$ and $ F (1) > 0$ (using the fact that $ f \ge 1$ on $[0,1] $). Then you can use IVT to deduce the result.
 
  • #5
Euge said:
$\displaystyle F(x) = \int_ 0^x f(t)\, dt - \frac{1}{2}$

I know that to be true, in general:
$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{x} f(t)\,dt = F(x) + K$
because the derivative of a constant is 0, but how did you deduce the above?
 
  • #6
Rido12 said:
I know that to be true, in general:
$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{x} f(t)\,dt = F(x) + K$
because the derivative of a constant is 0, but how did you deduce the above?

There's no need to involve the derivative. You know $ F$ is continuous on $[0,1] $, $F (0) = -\frac{1}{2} < 0$ and (since $f \ge 1$)

$\displaystyle F (1) \ge 1 - \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{2} > 0$.

So by the IVT, there is a point $c\in (0,1) $ such that $ F (c) = 0$. In other words,

$\displaystyle \int_0^c f (t)\, dt = \frac{1}{2} $.
 
  • #7
Right! The answer was so obvious...I got up to the point right before you applied the IVT, but I thought I was oversimplifying it. Thanks!

EDIT: On second though, I think my "thanks" was a bit premature. I understand your logic, but I'm still confused as to how you came up with this conclusion:

$\displaystyle F(x) = \int_ 0^x f(t)\, dt - \frac{1}{2}$

I understand how you got $F(0)$:

$\displaystyle F(x) = \int_ 0^0 f(t)\, dt - \frac{1}{2}=0-\frac{1}{2}=\frac{-1}{2}<0$

But how did you get $\displaystyle F (1) \ge 1 - \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{2} > 0$?
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Rido12 said:
Right! The answer was so obvious...I got up to the point right before you applied the IVT, but I thought I was oversimplifying it. Thanks!

EDIT: On second though, I think my "thanks" was a bit premature. I understand your logic, but I'm still confused as to how you came up with this conclusion:

$\displaystyle F(x) = \int_ 0^x f(t)\, dt - \frac{1}{2}$

I understand how you got $F(0)$:

$\displaystyle F(x) = \int_ 0^0 f(t)\, dt - \frac{1}{2}=0-\frac{1}{2}=\frac{-1}{2}<0$

But how did you get $\displaystyle F (1) \ge 1 - \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{2} > 0$?

Since $f(x) \ge 1$ for all $ x\in [0,1]$, we have

$\displaystyle \int_0^1 f(x)\, dx \ge \int_0^1 1 dx = 1$,

and therefore $ F(1) \ge 1 - \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{2} $.

Keep in mind this important property of integrals. If $ f $ and $ g $ are integrable on $[a, b] $ such that $f (x ) \ge g (x)$ for all $ x\in [a, b] $, then

$\displaystyle \int_a^b f (x)\, dx \ge \int_a^b g (x)\, dx$.
 

FAQ: Can a Point Exist in an Integratable Function Where the Integral Equals Half?

What is a calculus proof?

A calculus proof is a rigorous mathematical argument that demonstrates the truth of a given statement or theorem using the principles and techniques of calculus. It involves logical reasoning and relies on the fundamental rules of calculus such as differentiation, integration, and limits.

Why are calculus proofs important?

Calculus proofs are important because they provide a rigorous and systematic way to verify the validity of mathematical statements and theorems. They also help to deepen our understanding of the concepts and principles of calculus and their applications.

How do you approach a calculus proof?

The first step in approaching a calculus proof is to carefully read and understand the statement or theorem that needs to be proven. Then, identify the key concepts and principles that are involved and consider different approaches to prove the statement. It is also important to break down the proof into smaller, manageable steps and use logical reasoning to connect them together.

What are some common techniques used in calculus proofs?

Some common techniques used in calculus proofs include using the definition of a concept, using algebraic manipulation, using properties of limits, and applying theorems and rules of calculus such as the mean value theorem, intermediate value theorem, and fundamental theorem of calculus.

How can I improve my skills in solving calculus proofs?

The best way to improve your skills in solving calculus proofs is to practice regularly. Start with simpler proofs and gradually work your way up to more complex ones. It is also helpful to review the fundamental concepts and principles of calculus and familiarize yourself with common proof techniques. Additionally, seeking guidance from a teacher or tutor can also be beneficial.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
890
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top