- #1
Kevinc
- 3
- 0
I just got done taking a test and on of the problems read: A rotor is turning at 200 rpm and has an angular acceleration of -0.015w rads/s^2. How many seconds before the rotor is at 200rpm. How many revolutions before the rotor comes to rest.
Here is my method for solving:
w initial = 200rpm = 20.9 rads/s
a = dw/dt = -0.015w rads/s^2
dw/w = -0.015dt
ln(w) = -0.015t
integrating both sides yeilds
w = Ce^-0.015t
w = 20.9e^-0.015t
I got the correct answer for the first part, but seeing that this is exponential decay I answered that the rotor would never come to a complete rest. I was told that I have the wrong answer. My teacher demonstrated the "correct" approach.
a = (dw/dtheta) x (dtheta/dt) = (dw/dtheta)w = -0.015w
(dw/dtheta) = -0.015
dw = -0.015 dtheta
using 20.9 - 0 and 0-theta for limits of integration yields
-20.9 = -0.015theta
theta = 1393 rads or 222 revolutions
My assumption seems more logical that the rotor would never stop spinning under those circumstances and would there for have infinite revolutions, but i am unable to find any holes in my teachers method.
If anyone can point out any errors in either mine or my teachers method or give any explanation why to seemingly correct methods would yield different answers I would really appreciate it.
Here is my method for solving:
w initial = 200rpm = 20.9 rads/s
a = dw/dt = -0.015w rads/s^2
dw/w = -0.015dt
ln(w) = -0.015t
integrating both sides yeilds
w = Ce^-0.015t
w = 20.9e^-0.015t
I got the correct answer for the first part, but seeing that this is exponential decay I answered that the rotor would never come to a complete rest. I was told that I have the wrong answer. My teacher demonstrated the "correct" approach.
a = (dw/dtheta) x (dtheta/dt) = (dw/dtheta)w = -0.015w
(dw/dtheta) = -0.015
dw = -0.015 dtheta
using 20.9 - 0 and 0-theta for limits of integration yields
-20.9 = -0.015theta
theta = 1393 rads or 222 revolutions
My assumption seems more logical that the rotor would never stop spinning under those circumstances and would there for have infinite revolutions, but i am unable to find any holes in my teachers method.
If anyone can point out any errors in either mine or my teachers method or give any explanation why to seemingly correct methods would yield different answers I would really appreciate it.