Can a turbo expander convert more heat to work than a piston expander?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MysticDream
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A turbo expander operates by converting high-velocity gas into work, reducing its temperature and pressure, while a piston expander uses pressurized gas to do work on a piston. The discussion centers on which system can extract more heat and perform more work at the same exit pressure and temperature. The piston expander's adiabatic expansion formula suggests it can achieve maximum work and the lowest exit temperature for a given pressure. In contrast, the turbo expander may allow for more work by converting heat and pressure into kinetic energy, although the exact formula for this is still being explored. Ultimately, the goal is to maximize work output while maintaining a specific exit pressure for downstream processes.
MysticDream
Messages
112
Reaction score
9
TL;DR Summary
Trying to get a better understanding of adiabatic expansion
A turbo expander is a turbine moved by high velocity gas hitting it's blades and doing work, reducing it's temperature and pressure. A cylinder-piston expander uses pressurized and/or heated gas to do work on a piston reducing it's temperature and pressure. Let's say in both cases we have the same initial pressure, temperature, and exit pressure. In the case of the turbo, it's pressure and temp is it's stagnation point. The exit velocity is low enough to assume an approximate stagnation condition in both cases.

My question is, in which case can we extract the maximum amount of heat (and do the most amount of work) so that the temperature is lowest for the same exit pressure? So far, in the case of the cylinder-piston expander, the formula for adiabatic expansion seems to give the maximum amount of work that can be done and the lowest temperature that can be reached for a desired exit pressure. If I desired a lower exit temperature, it cannot be done unless I expand to a lower pressure. If I'm mistaken, please correct me.

In the case of the turbo expander, can more work can be done because the heat and pressure can be converted to kinetic energy by increasing the gases' velocity through the nozzle and doing work on the blades? I have yet to work out the formula for that. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Is this a theoretical question or a practical question?

In theory, if I have gas at temperature T and pressure P going into a black box, with temperature y and pressure p coming out, iit doesn't matter what kind of machinery is in the box - the maximum work is the sane. In practice, it probably depends on more than just piston vs turbine.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Is this a theoretical question or a practical question?

In theory, if I have gas at temperature T and pressure P going into a black box, with temperature y and pressure p coming out, iit doesn't matter what kind of machinery is in the box - the maximum work is the sane. In practice, it probably depends on more than just piston vs turbine.

Well it’s both. I’m trying to get the temperature lower at the exit of an expander for a desired pressure. The pressure can’t be lower because it feeds a compressor that has a specific compression ratio. I want to be able to use as much of the added heat to the gas as possible to do work. In the piston case, the heat has caused a rise in pressure which can then be used to do work. In the turbine case the heat has caused an increase in velocity and kinetic energy which can then be used to do work.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top