Can a turbo expander convert more heat to work than a piston expander?

  • Thread starter MysticDream
  • Start date
  • #1
MysticDream
112
9
TL;DR Summary
Trying to get a better understanding of adiabatic expansion
A turbo expander is a turbine moved by high velocity gas hitting it's blades and doing work, reducing it's temperature and pressure. A cylinder-piston expander uses pressurized and/or heated gas to do work on a piston reducing it's temperature and pressure. Let's say in both cases we have the same initial pressure, temperature, and exit pressure. In the case of the turbo, it's pressure and temp is it's stagnation point. The exit velocity is low enough to assume an approximate stagnation condition in both cases.

My question is, in which case can we extract the maximum amount of heat (and do the most amount of work) so that the temperature is lowest for the same exit pressure? So far, in the case of the cylinder-piston expander, the formula for adiabatic expansion seems to give the maximum amount of work that can be done and the lowest temperature that can be reached for a desired exit pressure. If I desired a lower exit temperature, it cannot be done unless I expand to a lower pressure. If I'm mistaken, please correct me.

In the case of the turbo expander, can more work can be done because the heat and pressure can be converted to kinetic energy by increasing the gases' velocity through the nozzle and doing work on the blades? I have yet to work out the formula for that. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is this a theoretical question or a practical question?

In theory, if I have gas at temperature T and pressure P going into a black box, with temperature y and pressure p coming out, iit doesn't matter what kind of machinery is in the box - the maximum work is the sane. In practice, it probably depends on more than just piston vs turbine.
 
  • #3
Vanadium 50 said:
Is this a theoretical question or a practical question?

In theory, if I have gas at temperature T and pressure P going into a black box, with temperature y and pressure p coming out, iit doesn't matter what kind of machinery is in the box - the maximum work is the sane. In practice, it probably depends on more than just piston vs turbine.

Well it’s both. I’m trying to get the temperature lower at the exit of an expander for a desired pressure. The pressure can’t be lower because it feeds a compressor that has a specific compression ratio. I want to be able to use as much of the added heat to the gas as possible to do work. In the piston case, the heat has caused a rise in pressure which can then be used to do work. In the turbine case the heat has caused an increase in velocity and kinetic energy which can then be used to do work.
 

FAQ: Can a turbo expander convert more heat to work than a piston expander?

What is the fundamental difference between a turbo expander and a piston expander in terms of converting heat to work?

The fundamental difference lies in their operating mechanisms. A turbo expander uses a turbine to convert thermal energy into mechanical work, typically in the form of rotational motion. In contrast, a piston expander uses a reciprocating piston to achieve the same conversion. The efficiency of each system depends on various factors, including the working fluid, operating conditions, and specific design features.

Which type of expander generally has higher efficiency in converting heat to work?

Turbo expanders generally have higher efficiency compared to piston expanders, especially at higher flow rates and continuous operation. The continuous rotational motion of turbo expanders tends to be more efficient in converting thermal energy to mechanical work, while piston expanders may suffer from greater mechanical losses and less efficient heat transfer.

Are there specific applications where a piston expander might outperform a turbo expander?

Yes, piston expanders can outperform turbo expanders in low-flow, high-pressure, or intermittent applications. They are also more suitable for applications requiring precise control over the expansion process. Piston expanders can handle variable loads and pressures better, making them useful in certain niche applications where turbo expanders may not be as effective.

How do maintenance requirements compare between turbo expanders and piston expanders?

Turbo expanders generally require less maintenance compared to piston expanders. The simpler design of turbo expanders, with fewer moving parts, results in lower wear and tear. Piston expanders have more complex mechanical components that are subject to higher friction and wear, leading to more frequent maintenance needs.

Can the choice of working fluid affect the efficiency of a turbo expander versus a piston expander?

Yes, the choice of working fluid can significantly impact the efficiency of both types of expanders. Turbo expanders often perform better with gases or vapors that have lower molecular weights and higher specific heat ratios. Piston expanders can be more versatile and handle a wider range of working fluids, including those with higher viscosities or phase changes. The optimal choice of working fluid depends on the specific application and operating conditions.

Back
Top