MHB Can AC^2 be Proven to Equal AB(AB+BC) in Triangle ABC with Angles B=80 and C=40?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In triangle ABC with angles B=80° and C=40°, the goal is to prove that AC² equals AB(AB + BC). The relationship involves applying the Law of Sines and the Law of Cosines to find the lengths of the sides based on the given angles. By establishing the necessary equations and substituting known values, the proof can be constructed. The discussion emphasizes the geometric properties and relationships within the triangle to validate the equation. Ultimately, the proof hinges on accurate calculations and understanding of triangle properties.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$\triangle ABC,\angle B=80^o,\angle C=40^o$
$prove :\overline{AC}^2=\overline{AB}(\overline{AB}+\overline{BC})$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Albert said:
$\triangle ABC,\angle B=80^o,\angle C=40^o$
$prove :\overline{AC}^2=\overline{AB}(\overline{AB}+\overline{BC})$

we have $\angle A=60^\circ$

using law of sines we have

$\frac{\overline{BC}+\overline{AB}}{\overline{AC}}= \frac{\sin \angle A + \sin \angle C}{\sin \angle B}=\frac{\sin \,60^\circ + \sin \,40^\circ}{\sin \,80^\circ} $
$= 2\frac{\sin \,50^\circ \cos \,10^\circ}{\cos 10^\circ} = 2\sin \,50^\circ $
further
$\frac{\overline{AC}}{\overline{AB}}= \dfrac{\sin\,80^\circ}{\sin\,40^\circ}= \dfrac{2\sin\,40^\circ\cos\,40^\circ}{\sin\,40^\circ}= 2\cos\,40^\circ = 2 \sin \, 50^\circ$

from above 2 we get the result
 
Albert said:
$\triangle ABC,\angle B=80^o,\angle C=40^o$
$prove :\overline{AC}^2=\overline{AB}(\overline{AB}+\overline{BC})$
hope someone can prove it using geometry
 
Albert said:
hope someone can prove it using geometry

Draw the triangle ABC and extend AB ro D such that BC = BD
join CD

now triangle CBD is isosceles triangle and hence $\overline{BC} = \overline{BD}$
now $\triangle ABC$ and $\triangle ACD$ are similar

so $\frac{\overline {AB}}{\overline {AC}}= \frac{\overline {AC}}{\overline {AD}} $
or ${\overline {AB}} * {\overline {AD}}= ({\overline {AC}})^2 $
or ${\overline {AB}} * ({\overline {AB} + \overline {BD}})= ({\overline {AC}})^2 $
or ${\overline {AB}} * ({\overline {AB} + \overline {BC}})= ({\overline {AC}})^2 $
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top