Can All Coefficients in a Continued Fraction Be the Same Integer?

  • Thread starter Klaus_Hoffmann
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Fractions
In summary, the question is whether a general continued fraction can be constructed with all coefficients equal to a certain integer, such as 3, 4, 5, 6, etc., and if so, what would be the resulting irrational number. It is noted that making all coefficients 1 gives the Fibonacci (golden ratio) constant, but it is unclear what the result would be for other values of the coefficients.
  • #1
Klaus_Hoffmann
86
1
Hi, my question is given the recurrence relation for the convergents, could we construct a continued fraction so..

[tex] \alpha = a_{0}+ \frac{b_{0}}{a_{1}+\frac{b_{1}}{a_{2}}+... [/tex]

all the coefficients a's and b's are equal to a certain integer ?

for example if all the coefficients (numerators and denomiators)

* are one we have just the Fibonacci (Golden ratio) constant [tex] \frac{2}{\sqrt 5 -1} [/tex]

* are two we have exactly [tex] \sqrt 2 +1 [/tex]

i the sense that expanding the 2 numbers above their continued fraction is made only by 1 or 2, but can we construct a general continued fraction with all the numbers equal to 3,4,5,6,...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Klaus_Hoffmann said:
Hi, my question is given the recurrence relation for the convergents, could we construct a continued fraction so..

[tex] \alpha = a_{0}+ \frac{b_{0}}{a_{1}+\frac{b_{1}}{a_{2}}+... [/tex]

all the coefficients a's and b's are equal to a certain integer ?

for example if all the coefficients (numerators and denomiators)

* are one we have just the Fibonacci (Golden ratio) constant [tex] \frac{2}{\sqrt 5 -1} [/tex]

* are two we have exactly [tex] \sqrt 2 +1 [/tex]

i the sense that expanding the 2 numbers above their continued fraction is made only by 1 or 2, but can we construct a general continued fraction with all the numbers equal to 3,4,5,6,...
Something doesn't seem right. If making all the a's and b's 1 gives the Fibonacci (golden ratio) constant, wouldn't making all the a's and b's 2 simply be 2 times the Golden ration rather than [tex] \sqrt 2 + 1 [/tex].

Postscript. On the other hand: It seemed to me that any similar manner of construction a continued fraction will give an irrational number of some fixed value which would be a multiple of the continued fraction comprising only ones, but then n/n = 1 so I guess I made a mistake. Anyway at least the numbers are completely predefined.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
?

It is possible to construct a continued fraction where all the coefficients are equal to a certain integer. This type of continued fraction is known as a regular continued fraction. In fact, the examples you have provided (Fibonacci constant and \sqrt 2 +1) are both regular continued fractions with all coefficients equal to 1 and 2, respectively.

To construct a regular continued fraction with all coefficients equal to a certain integer, we can use the recurrence relation for convergents. This recurrence relation is given by:

\frac{p_{n}}{q_{n}} = a_{n}+\frac{1}{\frac{q_{n-1}}{p_{n-1}}}

where p_{n} and q_{n} denote the numerator and denominator of the nth convergent, and a_{n} is the nth coefficient.

In order for all the coefficients to be equal to a certain integer, we can set each a_{n} equal to that integer. For example, if we want all the coefficients to be equal to 3, we would have:

\frac{p_{n}}{q_{n}} = 3+\frac{1}{\frac{q_{n-1}}{p_{n-1}}}

This would give us a regular continued fraction with all coefficients equal to 3. Similarly, we can construct regular continued fractions with all coefficients equal to 4, 5, 6, and so on.

However, it is important to note that not all regular continued fractions with equal coefficients will have a closed form expression like the examples you have provided. In fact, most regular continued fractions with equal coefficients will not have a closed form expression. This is because regular continued fractions with equal coefficients often represent irrational numbers, and irrational numbers do not have finite decimal expansions or closed form expressions.

In conclusion, it is possible to construct a continued fraction with all coefficients equal to a certain integer using the recurrence relation for convergents. However, not all of these continued fractions will have a closed form expression, as most of them will represent irrational numbers.
 

FAQ: Can All Coefficients in a Continued Fraction Be the Same Integer?

1. What is a continued fraction?

A continued fraction is a representation of a real number as an infinite sequence of fractions, where each fraction is composed of an integer numerator and denominator. It is denoted by [a0; a1, a2, a3, ...], where the initial term a0 is a whole number and the remaining terms are positive integers.

2. How is a continued fraction different from a regular fraction?

A regular fraction, also known as a simple fraction, is a finite expression representing a rational number, where the numerator and denominator are both integers. A continued fraction, on the other hand, is an infinite expression representing a real number and has a more complex structure.

3. What are some applications of continued fractions?

Continued fractions have many practical applications in mathematics and other fields. They are used in number theory, approximation theory, and solving certain types of equations. They are also used in physics, engineering, and computer science for tasks such as signal processing and data compression.

4. How are continued fractions related to the Golden Ratio?

The Golden Ratio, also known as the divine proportion, is a special irrational number that has been studied since ancient times for its aesthetic and mathematical properties. It can be represented as a continued fraction [1; 1, 1, 1, ...], and has many interesting connections to continued fractions, including its appearance in the Fibonacci sequence.

5. Are there any limitations to using continued fractions?

While continued fractions have many useful applications, there are also some limitations to their use. They can only represent real numbers, so they cannot be used to represent complex numbers. Additionally, computing with continued fractions can be more complex and time-consuming compared to using regular fractions or decimal representations.

Similar threads

Back
Top