Can anyone please review/verify this proof of assertion?

  • Thread starter Math100
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
In summary: I will make sure to use the correct terminology in the future. Thank you! I will make sure to use the correct terminology in the future.
  • #1
Math100
802
222
Homework Statement
Prove the assertion below:
Any prime of the form 3n+1 is also of the form 6m+1.
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof: Suppose that any prime of the form 3n+1
is also of the form 6m+1.
Note that 2 is the only even prime number
and it is not of the form 3n+1.
This means any prime of the form 3n+1 must be odd.
Since 3n+1 is odd, it follows that 3n must be even.
Then we have n=2m for some integer m.
Thus 3n+1=3(2m)+1
=6m+1.
Therefore, any prime of the form 3n+1 is also of the form 6m+1.

Above is my proof for this assertion. Can anyone please review/verify to see if it's correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It is correct. Nothing to complain about.

You can also write it in formulas, after you excluded ##p=2## as you did:
##p=3n-1 \Longrightarrow 3\,|\,(p-1)## and, as you correctly observed, ##p## is odd, so ##p-1## is even, i.e.
##2\,|\,(p-1).## Because ##2## and ##3## are coprime (no common divisor), we get ##2\cdot 3\,|\,(p-1)## which is ##6m=p-1## or ##p=6m+1##.
 
  • Like
Likes Math100
  • #3
fresh_42 said:
It is correct. Nothing to complain about.

You can also write it in formulas, after you excluded ##p=2## as you did:
##p=3n-1 \Longrightarrow 3\,|\,(p-1)## and, as you correctly observed, ##p## is odd, so ##p-1## is even, i.e.
##2\,|\,(p-1).## Because ##2## and ##3## are coprime (no common divisor), we get ##2\cdot 3\,|\,(p-1)## which is ##6m=p-1## or ##p=6m+1##.
Thank you!
 
  • #4
Math100 said:
Thank you!
Note that coprime is important here! If two numbers have a common divisor, say ##4## and ##6##, then both divide ##12## but ##4\cdot 6## does not!
 
  • Like
Likes Math100
  • #5
Your logic is correct, but I would recommend a little rewording.
Math100 said:
Homework Statement:: Prove the assertion below:
Any prime of the form 3n+1 is also of the form 6m+1.
Relevant Equations:: None.

Proof: Suppose that any prime of the form 3n+1
is also of the form 6m+1.
You do not want to "suppose" this. That would be assuming the fact that you want to prove.
You should start with something like:
Proof: Suppose we have a prime, p, of the form p=3n+1.
Math100 said:
Note that 2 is the only even prime number
and it is not of the form 3n+1.
So p is not 2.
Math100 said:
This means any prime of the form 3n+1 must be odd.
Since 3n+1 is odd, it follows that 3n must be even.
Then we have n=2m for some integer m.
Thus 3n+1=3(2m)+1
=6m+1.
p = 6m+1.
##\blacksquare##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Math100 and Orodruin
  • #6
FactChecker said:
Your logic is correct, but I would recommend a little rewording.

You do not want to "suppose" this. That would be assuming the fact that you want to prove.
You should start with something like:
Proof: Suppose we have a prime, p, of the form p=3n+1.

So p is not 2.

p = 6m+1.
##\blacksquare##
Thank you!
 

FAQ: Can anyone please review/verify this proof of assertion?

What is the purpose of requesting a review or verification of a proof?

The purpose of requesting a review or verification of a proof is to ensure the accuracy and validity of the assertion being made. By having another scientist or expert review the proof, any potential errors or flaws can be identified and corrected, strengthening the overall credibility of the assertion.

How do you determine who is qualified to review or verify a proof?

The qualifications of a reviewer or verifier will depend on the specific field of study and the complexity of the proof. Generally, someone with expertise and knowledge in the relevant subject area and experience in evaluating proofs would be considered qualified.

Is it common for proofs to undergo review or verification?

Yes, it is common for proofs to undergo review or verification in the scientific community. This is a standard practice to ensure the accuracy and reliability of scientific claims.

What should be included in a request for review or verification of a proof?

A request for review or verification of a proof should include the proof itself, along with any relevant background information, references, and supporting data. It is also helpful to provide a brief explanation of the purpose and significance of the proof.

How long does the review or verification process typically take?

The length of the review or verification process can vary depending on the complexity of the proof and the availability of qualified reviewers. It is important to allow enough time for a thorough and rigorous evaluation, which may take several weeks or even months.

Back
Top