- #1
Mike S.
- 91
- 32
- TL;DR Summary
- A cell contains K+ ions on the inside and Na+ ions on the outside of an impermeable membrane. Can you relate the potential energy of the chemical potential (for example the Nernst potential) to information about the ions (Landauer principle)?
I was reading a great thread that pointed me to Robert Alicki, “Information is not physical“ (https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.2414). My that appeals to me, based on the apparent fruitlessness of understanding the system otherwise. But I don't know if it's even published, and even if "everybody has been lying to you" is the most common explanation for why you get confused about physics, it's not the only one. Oh, and I should note the recent peer-reviewed alternative position that information is equivalent to mass and energy.
I'll simplify a cell a little here, turning it into a membrane between two halves of a chamber. On one side, we have 1 molar NaCl in water (we'll say it's a halophile...) and on the other we have 1 M KCl (I'll only use this here to keep the osmotic effects under control). There are protein channels in the membrane that can be opened or shut, which allow either Na+ or K+ to pass through.
The energy that can be extracted can be expressed in a rather long-winded fashion in the Nernst potential - RT/zF ln Q, where Q is the reaction quotient, here the concentration of the ion (the one we would open the channel for, let's say Na+) on the inside and outside of the cell. It represents the voltage (a store of the energy which can be measured over the cell membrane if the channel is opened). The Faraday constant F is needed because at the time of Nernst's writing (and also this posting I suppose) the ampere was used in the SI system, so electrical potential energy was still being measured in J/C rather than J/Eq. The z relates moles of charge to moles of ions. But it is the ions which are being counted as they pass through the membrane, and which are subject to a Boltzmann distribution: E = K e^(-RT). Note the striking aspect that there is hypothetically infinite energy available when one concentration is zero, as we start with here, because given enough time the channel at a finite temperature will allow a single ion to pass through into an empty space against any potential difference whatsoever. Writing that in terms of information should be interesting.
The channels make it possible to set an equilibrium between an electrical potential on the membrane and the energy encoded (?) in the "information" of the particle. I doubt that this is simply which side of the membrane it is on, but perhaps it has to do with how well you can localize its position in space on one side or the other?
Although the ions are in water, they act much like a gas of particles (right down to the quantity of osmotic or gas pressure they would apply to a membrane). So I'm hoping the answers here also give a yes or no to Alicki's statement that "gas of atoms may possesses a well-defined entropy but does not encode any information".
I'll simplify a cell a little here, turning it into a membrane between two halves of a chamber. On one side, we have 1 molar NaCl in water (we'll say it's a halophile...) and on the other we have 1 M KCl (I'll only use this here to keep the osmotic effects under control). There are protein channels in the membrane that can be opened or shut, which allow either Na+ or K+ to pass through.
The energy that can be extracted can be expressed in a rather long-winded fashion in the Nernst potential - RT/zF ln Q, where Q is the reaction quotient, here the concentration of the ion (the one we would open the channel for, let's say Na+) on the inside and outside of the cell. It represents the voltage (a store of the energy which can be measured over the cell membrane if the channel is opened). The Faraday constant F is needed because at the time of Nernst's writing (and also this posting I suppose) the ampere was used in the SI system, so electrical potential energy was still being measured in J/C rather than J/Eq. The z relates moles of charge to moles of ions. But it is the ions which are being counted as they pass through the membrane, and which are subject to a Boltzmann distribution: E = K e^(-RT). Note the striking aspect that there is hypothetically infinite energy available when one concentration is zero, as we start with here, because given enough time the channel at a finite temperature will allow a single ion to pass through into an empty space against any potential difference whatsoever. Writing that in terms of information should be interesting.
The channels make it possible to set an equilibrium between an electrical potential on the membrane and the energy encoded (?) in the "information" of the particle. I doubt that this is simply which side of the membrane it is on, but perhaps it has to do with how well you can localize its position in space on one side or the other?
Although the ions are in water, they act much like a gas of particles (right down to the quantity of osmotic or gas pressure they would apply to a membrane). So I'm hoping the answers here also give a yes or no to Alicki's statement that "gas of atoms may possesses a well-defined entropy but does not encode any information".
Last edited: