Can Electrons and Protons Create a Neutral Particle at Rest?

In summary, the maximum mass that can be produced in the collision between an electron and proton is equal to the total energy in the center of mass frame, which can be calculated using the invariant mass of the particles and the kinetic energy of the electron. The mass of the new particle can then be determined using conservation of energy and momentum.
  • #1
Brewer
212
0

Homework Statement


I'm not going to write the full question as its not neccessary, but this is the gist of it.

Electrons are fired at protons and a search is made for a neutral particle created in the impact. Both the electron and proton still exist after the impact, along with this new particle. What is the maximum mass that can be produced. Use any reasonable approximations, but justify your arguments.

Basically it strikes me that the maximum mass of this new particle would be in the case that both the electron and proton are stationary after the collision. But is this a physically possible scenario??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Brewer said:

Homework Statement


I'm not going to write the full question as its not neccessary, but this is the gist of it.

Electrons are fired at protons and a search is made for a neutral particle created in the impact. Both the electron and proton still exist after the impact, along with this new particle. What is the maximum mass that can be produced. Use any reasonable approximations, but justify your arguments.

Basically it strikes me that the maximum mass of this new particle would be in the case that both the electron and proton are stationary after the collision. But is this a physically possible scenario??

Yes, stationary in the center of mass frame.
 
  • #3
Just take the kinetic energy of the initially moving electron and set that energy to equal mc^2 after the collision and you have the mass of the new particle.
 
  • #4
In this case is it the case that:

[tex](\Sigma E)^2 - (\Sigma p)^2 = (m_e + m_p + m_Q)^2[/tex]

I'm using the non SI units that allow c to equal one.

so [tex](\Sigma E)^2[/tex] = Ee = [tex]{p_e}^2+{m_e}^2[/tex], [tex](\Sigma P) = {p_e}^2[/tex]

Therefore:
[tex]{m_e}^2 = {m_e}^2 + {m_p}^2 + {m_Q}^2 + 2{m_e}{m_p} + 2{m_p}{m_Q} + 2{m_e}{m_Q}[/tex]

From here I seem a little confused. I can't seem to rearrange to solve for mQ (which I just realized I haven't explicitly defined as my name for the new particle). Any help would be appreciated, but I will be banging on with it in the mean time.

Thanks
 
  • #5
I think I have some working wrong here - please ignore. I will be going to see lecturers and/or peers tomorrow about this problem.
 
  • #6
You just write down conservation of four momentum:

p1 + p2 = p1' + p2' + pq

Then you reason as follows. If the mass of the new particle is maximal, then you are at threshold. In the center of mass frame the total momentum is zero, and then all the 3-momenta on the right hand side are zero. You can then extract the mass of the q-particle using conservation of energy. So, all you need to know is the energy of the electron + proton before the collision in the center of mass frame, but that's just the invariant mass. If E is the total energy in tthe COM frame then (1 = electron, 2 = proton, q = neutral particle):

E^2 = (p1 + p2)^2 = p1^2 + p2^2 + 2 p1 dot p2 =

m1^2 + m2^2 + 2 E_e m2 (if proton was initially at rest) =

m1^2 + m2^2 + 2 (Eekin + m1) m2 =

(m1 + m2 )^2 + 2 Eekin m2

So, the energy is:

E = sqrt[(m1 + m2 )^2 + 2 Eekin m2]

The total energy in the COM frame after the collision is:

m1 + m2 + mq, because all the particles are at rest. Therefore:

mq = sqrt[(m1 + m2 )^2 + 2 Eekin m2] - m1 - m2
 

FAQ: Can Electrons and Protons Create a Neutral Particle at Rest?

1. What are assumptions and why are they important in the scientific method?

Assumptions are beliefs or ideas that are taken for granted and not explicitly stated. In the scientific method, assumptions are important because they help guide the research process and provide a starting point for scientific inquiry. They also allow scientists to make predictions and draw conclusions from their data.

2. How do scientists determine if their assumptions are valid?

Scientists use a variety of methods to determine the validity of their assumptions. These can include conducting experiments, collecting data, and peer-reviewing their work. Additionally, scientists may reevaluate and revise their assumptions as new evidence is discovered.

3. What happens if a scientist's assumptions are proven to be invalid?

If a scientist's assumptions are proven to be invalid, it can call into question the validity of their entire research process and results. It may also require the scientist to revise their assumptions and potentially change their methods or conclusions.

4. Can assumptions ever be completely eliminated from scientific research?

No, assumptions are an inherent part of the scientific method and cannot be completely eliminated. However, scientists can strive to identify and acknowledge their assumptions, and take steps to minimize their influence on their research and conclusions.

5. How can the validity of assumptions be improved in scientific research?

The validity of assumptions can be improved by conducting thorough research, using multiple methods and data sources, and collaborating with other scientists. Additionally, being open to revisions and criticisms of assumptions can help improve their validity in the scientific community.

Back
Top