- #36
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 42,988
- 981
That doesn't really mean much. You can't "observe" all of the digits in the decimal expansion of 1/3 either. But you can use "1/3" just as easily as "[itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex]" or "e".BenG549 said:Yeah OK 'real' was a VERY bad choice of word on my part (especially given we are discussing mathematics), I guess I didn't mean real because that might suggest that I feel other mathematical ideas are fictional or that negative numbers do not exist on a number line and so on. I'm not saying irrational numbers etc don't exist... I've used them, I know they exist, but in the case of irrational numbers they are uncountable (Cantor's diagonal argument?.. someone with a maths degree might be able to qualify that) you can't observe an infinite series of digits or sets that is what I meant by not real (I accept that it was a bad word to use but in the context of my opening post I didn't think it was going to lead to this lol).
Yeah, you're probably right. Thanks for trying anyway. Didn't mean to annoy anyone too much. I guess I should just concede that I'm either being wildly miss understood or too stupid to understand why I'm wrong, either way I should probably give up.