- #1
Coffee_
- 259
- 2
We went over this concept quite fast in class and there is one thing that confused me:
When transforming from a set of ##q_i## and ##p_i##to ##Q_i## and ##P_i##, if one checks that the transormations are canonical the new Hamiltonian ##K(Q_i, P_i)## obeys exactly the same equations.This has been proven.
Question: How does one in general find this new Hamiltonian ##K(Q_i, P_i)##? I have gotten the impression that it's not as easy as just substituting the transformations into the old coordinates, or is it?
When transforming from a set of ##q_i## and ##p_i##to ##Q_i## and ##P_i##, if one checks that the transormations are canonical the new Hamiltonian ##K(Q_i, P_i)## obeys exactly the same equations.This has been proven.
Question: How does one in general find this new Hamiltonian ##K(Q_i, P_i)##? I have gotten the impression that it's not as easy as just substituting the transformations into the old coordinates, or is it?