MHB Can $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ Be Proven as a Principal Ideal Domain?

  • Thread starter Thread starter javi410
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Primes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that a prime \( p \neq 3 \) can be expressed as \( p = x^2 + 3y^2 \) if \( p \equiv 1 \pmod{3} \). The initial argument hinges on the fact that since \(-3\) is a quadratic residue modulo \( p \), the ideal \((p)\) in \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]\) must factor into two ideals. However, the main challenge is proving that \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]\) is a principal ideal domain (PID). It is concluded that \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]\) is not a PID because it fails to be a unique factorization domain, as demonstrated by the factorization of \(4\) into non-prime elements. Thus, the original claim cannot be established.
javi410
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Im trying to prove that a prime $p\neq 3$ is of the form $p=x^2 + 3y^2$ if $p \equiv 1 \pmod{3}$.

I have think in a prove as follows:
As we know that $-3$ is a quadratic residue mod p, we know that the ideal $(p)$ must divide $(x^2 + 3) = (x + \sqrt{-3})(x - \sqrt{-3})$ in the ring $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$.
$p$ don't divide any of the factors so it can not be prime in $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$, so there are ideals $I,J$ of $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ such that
\[
(p) = I\cdot J
\]
and, if we prove that $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ is a PID, we have the result as we can take elements $u,v$ of $I$ and $J$ such that $u\cdot v$ has norm $p^2$, therefore the norm of $u = a^2 + b\sqrt{-3}$ is $p =a^2 + 3b^2$.

The problem is that I don't know how to prove that $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ is a PID.

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
javi410 said:
Hi,
Im trying to prove that a prime $p\neq 3$ is of the form $p=x^2 + 3y^2$ if $p \equiv 1 \pmod{3}$.

I have think in a prove as follows:
As we know that $-3$ is a quadratic residue mod p, we know that the ideal $(p)$ must divide $(x^2 + 3) = (x + \sqrt{-3})(x - \sqrt{-3})$ in the ring $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$.
$p$ don't divide any of the factors so it can not be prime in $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$, so there are ideals $I,J$ of $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ such that
\[
(p) = I\cdot J
\]
and, if we prove that $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ is a PID, we have the result as we can take elements $u,v$ of $I$ and $J$ such that $u\cdot v$ has norm $p^2$, therefore the norm of $u = a^2 + b\sqrt{-3}$ is $p =a^2 + 3b^2$.

The problem is that I don't know how to prove that $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ is a PID.

Thanks!

Wellcome on MHB javi410!...

Setting $p= 3 n + a$, where it must be $a=1$ or $a=2$, You have...

$\displaystyle x^{2} + 3\ y^{2} = 3\ n + a \implies x^{2} \equiv a\ \text{mod}\ 3\ (1)$

Now the equation (1) has solution only if $a = 1$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
javi410 said:
The problem is that I don't know how to prove that $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ is a PID.

You won't be, because $\Bbb Z[\sqrt{-3}]$ is not a principal ideal domain.

Consider $4 = (1 + \sqrt{-3})(1 - \sqrt{-3})$. $2$ divides $4$, but doesn't divide either of $1 \pm \sqrt{-3}$, so it's not a prime. Thus, it's not an unique factorization domain, so cannot possibly be a PID either.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top