Can someone please show me why e[itex]^{-ikx}[/itex] +

  • Thread starter BadAtMath6
  • Start date
In summary, e^{-ikx} + e^{ikx} simplifies to 2e^{ikx} instead of 1+e^{ikx} because cos(-t)+i*sin(-t) + cos(t)+ i*sin(t) is equal to 2cos(t) which is the exponential form for 2cos(t).
  • #1
BadAtMath6
3
0
Can someone please show me why e[itex]^{-ikx}[/itex] + e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex] simplifies to 2e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex] instead of 1+e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex]??
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2


BadAtMath6 said:
Can someone please show me why e[itex]^{-ikx}[/itex] + e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex] simplifies to 2e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex] instead of 1+e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex]??
It doesn't at all. It is equal to 2cos(kx).
 
  • #3


Ok, yes, that's true and I can get there if I change e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex] to cos(kx) + i*sin(kx). But I'm having exponent issues if I don't change it into sine and cosine (i.e. [itex]\frac{1}{e^{ikx}}[/itex] + [itex]\frac{e^{ikx}}{1}[/itex] ). Wouldn't that simplify to 1 + e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex]?
 
  • #4


Well, neither of your answers are really correct. Your answer is already in about as simple a form as it can get... maybe this could be simpler?

[tex]e^{-i k x} \left( 1 + e^{2 i k x} \right)[/tex]
 
  • #5


BadAtMath6 said:
Ok, yes, that's true and I can get there if I change e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex] to cos(kx) + i*sin(kx). But I'm having exponent issues if I don't change it into sine and cosine (i.e. [itex]\frac{1}{e^{ikx}}[/itex] + [itex]\frac{e^{ikx}}{1}[/itex] ). Wouldn't that simplify to 1 + e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex]?

I worked through the initial expression and also came to [itex]1+e^{ikx} [/itex]
 
  • #6


symbolipoint said:
I worked through the initial expression and also came to [itex]1+e^{ikx}[/itex]

Show us your work. You're making a mistake here somewhere.
 
  • #7


BadAtMath6 said:
Can someone please show me why e[itex]^{-ikx}[/itex] + e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex] simplifies to 2e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex] instead of 1+e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex]??

I just noticed: You edited the original post for a sign change. I worked with what you wrote originally, e^(-ikx) - e^(ikx), [itex]e^{-ikx}-e^{ikx} [/itex]
 
  • #8


As the addition instead of the subtraction, this process:
Using t=kx,

cos(-t)+i*sin(-t) + cos(t)+ i*sin(t)
= cos(t) - i*sin(t) + cos(t) +i*sin(t)
= cos(t) + cos(t) + i*sin(t) - i*sin(t)
= 2cos(t)

Please check my understanding of these steps, since I cannot think of a way to transform that back to exponential form.
 
  • #9


Yup, you got that part right. The thing is, you started with the exponential form for 2cos(t). You started with

[tex]e^{- i t} + e^{i t}[/tex]

and ended with 2 cos(t). What you started with IS the exponential form.
 

FAQ: Can someone please show me why e[itex]^{-ikx}[/itex] +

What does e-ikx represent?

The expression e-ikx is a mathematical function known as the complex exponential. It represents a complex number with a magnitude of 1 and an angle of -kx in the complex plane.

How is e-ikx used in science?

e-ikx is used extensively in many areas of science, including physics, mathematics, and engineering. It is used in the study of wave phenomena, such as in the wave equation, and in the analysis of quantum mechanics.

What is the relationship between e-ikx and trigonometric functions?

e-ikx is closely related to trigonometric functions, specifically the cosine and sine functions. In fact, the complex exponential can be expressed in terms of these functions through Euler's formula: e-ix = cos(x) - i sin(x).

Can you give an example of where e-ikx is used in real-world applications?

e-ikx has many practical applications, such as in signal processing, electrical engineering, and optics. One example is in the analysis of electromagnetic waves, where e-ikx is used to describe the propagation of waves through space.

How does e-ikx relate to the imaginary unit, i?

e-ikx is often written in the form e-ikx = cos(kx) - i sin(kx), where i is the imaginary unit (i.e. the square root of -1). This representation highlights the connection between the complex exponential and the imaginary unit, allowing for easier manipulation and calculation of complex numbers.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
988
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top