- #1
LCSphysicist
- 646
- 162
- Homework Statement
- "When (x−y)2<0 we can perform a Lorentz transformation taking (x−y)→−(x−y). Note that if (x−y)2>0 there is no continuous Lorentz transformation that takes (x−y)→−(x−y)"
- Relevant Equations
- The metric is majority -
I want to understand bettew what this statement says. Maybe later we could try to put it mathematically, but for while i want to know if my interpretation is right.
When we lie outside the light cone, the physics regarding the limit of the velocity is break, and technically we could go faster than light. So, if we want, we could perorm a transformation in x and y such that they got alterned sign instantaneally in a reference frame. So we can have a transformation that leads (x−y)→−(x−y) at the same time if the points are spacelike.
But, if they are timelike, we couldn't go so fast (it need to be avaliated at the same time), and we can't find a transformation that change the signs.
Is this the right interpretation? Let me know any error
When we lie outside the light cone, the physics regarding the limit of the velocity is break, and technically we could go faster than light. So, if we want, we could perorm a transformation in x and y such that they got alterned sign instantaneally in a reference frame. So we can have a transformation that leads (x−y)→−(x−y) at the same time if the points are spacelike.
But, if they are timelike, we couldn't go so fast (it need to be avaliated at the same time), and we can't find a transformation that change the signs.
Is this the right interpretation? Let me know any error