- #36
jonmtkisco
- 532
- 1
Hi Haelfix,
Yes I'm aware that it is believed that a certain amount of degenerate electron gas migrates to the core of a white dwarf. Then the collapse scenario becomes essentially what I have repeatedly described here as the "external force" scenario. An outer dense shell of (nearly) electrically neutral matter supplies the gravitational bulk which crushes an inner ball of electron gas. The electron gas is not crushed by its own gravity, it is crushed by the outer shell of nearly neutral plasma.
If there was a mechanism to remove the entire outer shell of nearly neutral plasma, the remaining negatively charged core of the star would not collapse, regardless of its mass. Instead it would fly apart at high acceleration.
Jon
Haelfix said:So actually what you normally have is a thin outer strip around the White dwarf of mostly nondegenerate matter (read much of the nuclei), and the bulk is degenerate matter where the density of electrons is much, much higher than protons and neutrons and so forth.
If you look at the system from the interior, as I said, you have very much the same sort of thing. The more mass you put it, creates more electrons in the bulk and contrary to what you would think, actually *shrinks* the star.
Yes I'm aware that it is believed that a certain amount of degenerate electron gas migrates to the core of a white dwarf. Then the collapse scenario becomes essentially what I have repeatedly described here as the "external force" scenario. An outer dense shell of (nearly) electrically neutral matter supplies the gravitational bulk which crushes an inner ball of electron gas. The electron gas is not crushed by its own gravity, it is crushed by the outer shell of nearly neutral plasma.
If there was a mechanism to remove the entire outer shell of nearly neutral plasma, the remaining negatively charged core of the star would not collapse, regardless of its mass. Instead it would fly apart at high acceleration.
Jon
Last edited: