Can the Archimedean Property Prove 1/n < x for All Positive Reals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Samuelb88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complete Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on using the Archimedean property to prove that for any positive real number x, there exists a natural number n such that 1/n < x. The proof begins by manipulating the inequality 1 < nx, leading to the conclusion that b/a < n when x is expressed as a/b. However, a participant suggests that the proof is overly complicated and could be simplified by avoiding the introduction of new variables a and b. They hint at using the fact that 1/x is also a positive real number to streamline the argument. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity and conciseness in mathematical proofs.
Samuelb88
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use the Archimedean property: For all x in the positive reals there exists an n in the naturals such that n > x.

to prove: For all x in the positive reals there exists an n in the naturals such that 1/n < x.

The Attempt at a Solution



Proof: Multiplying through the inequality by n (I am not including 0 in the set of all natural numbers) yields 1 < nx. Let x = a/b, where a,b are in the positive reals. Substituting into the inequality the subsequent value of x yields 1 < (an)/b. Dividing through the inequality by a/b yields b/a < n, where b/a is in the positive reals. By the Archimedean property, we may always find an n in the naturals such that n > b/a. This proves the first consequence of the Archimedean property. Q.E.D. ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Samuelb8! :smile:

Yes, it's correct, but you won't get many marks for it, since it's too roundabout.

You talk about two new numbers, a and b (and you give no way of defining them), but all you use them for is defining b/a …

can you find a shorter version of your proof that doesn't need a or b? :wink:
 
Hint: 1/x is a positive real too.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K