- #1
Dschumanji
- 153
- 1
When you see the graphs of the functions [itex]f(x)=e^{x}[/itex] and [itex]f(x)=x[/itex] it is obvious that the former is always greater than the latter (when x is a real number) for the portion of the graph you are observing. In elementary algebra, this was the "proof" that the following inequality is true for all real numbers x: [itex]e^{x} > x[/itex].
By using calculus, you can prove that that the inequality [itex]e^{x} > x[/itex] is true for all real number x. One method is to employ the properties of exponents to show that [itex]e^{x} > x[/itex] for real numbers less than or equal to 0 and then show that [itex]e^{x} \leq x[/itex] results in a contradiction when you let x increase without bound. Another method, which is much simpler than the first, is to show that the power series of [itex]e^{x}[/itex] necessarily implies [itex]e^{x} > x[/itex] for all real numbers x.
Is it possible to prove [itex]e^{x} > x[/itex] for all real numbers x without resorting to calculus? Can you use elementary algebra to prove it? Is the previous question not possible because the function [itex]e^{x}[/itex] is transcendental?
By using calculus, you can prove that that the inequality [itex]e^{x} > x[/itex] is true for all real number x. One method is to employ the properties of exponents to show that [itex]e^{x} > x[/itex] for real numbers less than or equal to 0 and then show that [itex]e^{x} \leq x[/itex] results in a contradiction when you let x increase without bound. Another method, which is much simpler than the first, is to show that the power series of [itex]e^{x}[/itex] necessarily implies [itex]e^{x} > x[/itex] for all real numbers x.
Is it possible to prove [itex]e^{x} > x[/itex] for all real numbers x without resorting to calculus? Can you use elementary algebra to prove it? Is the previous question not possible because the function [itex]e^{x}[/itex] is transcendental?