Can the RMS-AM inequality prove the combinatorial coefficient inequality?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Saitama
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Inequality
In summary, the problem is to prove that the sum of square roots of a series of combinatorial coefficients is less than or equal to a certain expression, where n is a natural number. The attempt to use the RMS-AM inequality was made, but it was not clear how to proceed. The solution involves proving that (2^n-1)*n\geq\frac{(2^n-1)}{n} using the fact that n is an integer greater than or equal to 1.
  • #1
Saitama
4,243
93
Problem:
Prove:
$$\sqrt{C_1}+\sqrt{C_2}+\sqrt{C_3}+...+\sqrt{C_n} \leq 2^{n-1}+\frac{n-1}{2}$$

where $C_0,C_1,C_2,...,C_n$ are combinatorial coefficients in the expansion of $(1+x)^n$, $n \in \mathbb{N}$.

Attempt:

I thought of using the RMS-AM inequality and got:

$$\sqrt{C_1}+\sqrt{C_2}+\sqrt{C_3}+...+\sqrt{C_n} \leq \sqrt{\frac{2^n-1}{n}}$$

Where I have used $C_1+C_2+C_3+...+C_n=2^n-1$.

But I don't see how to proceed from here.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
use
\(\displaystyle (2^n-1)*n\geq\frac{(2^n-1)}{n}\)
and then \(\displaystyle AM\geq GM\)
for \(\displaystyle 2^n-1\) and \(\displaystyle n\)
 
  • #3
mathworker said:
use
\(\displaystyle (2^n-1)*n\geq\frac{(2^n-1)}{n}\)
and then \(\displaystyle AM\geq GM\)
for \(\displaystyle 2^n-1\) and \(\displaystyle n\)

Thanks mathworker!

I was able to reach the answer but how do you prove $(2^n-1)*n\geq\frac{(2^n-1)}{n}$? :confused:
 
  • #4
as \(\displaystyle C_0,C_1,C_2,...,C_n\) are combinatorial coeffs of \(\displaystyle (1+x)^n\). n is certainly an integer which is \(\displaystyle \geq 1 \).
the rest is obvious...:)
 
  • #5
mathworker said:
as \(\displaystyle C_0,C_1,C_2,...,C_n\) are combinatorial coeffs of \(\displaystyle (1+x)^n\). n is certainly an integer which is \(\displaystyle \geq 1 \).
the rest is obvious...:)

Understood, thanks a lot mathworker! :)
 

FAQ: Can the RMS-AM inequality prove the combinatorial coefficient inequality?

How do you prove an inequality?

There are several ways to prove an inequality, but the most common methods include using algebraic manipulation, mathematical induction, and graphing techniques. The method used will depend on the specific inequality and the available information.

What is the importance of proving an inequality?

Proving an inequality is important because it allows us to determine whether a statement or equation is always true or only true in certain situations. It also helps us understand the relationships between different quantities and can be used to solve real-world problems.

Can an inequality be proven using only numerical examples?

No, an inequality cannot be proven using only numerical examples. While numerical examples can provide evidence for an inequality, they do not constitute a formal proof. A proof must be based on logical reasoning and mathematical principles.

Are there any common mistakes to avoid when proving an inequality?

Yes, there are some common mistakes to avoid when proving an inequality. These include assuming what you are trying to prove, using incorrect mathematical operations, and not clearly stating the steps in your proof. It is important to double-check your work and make sure your reasoning is sound.

Can an inequality ever be disproven?

Yes, an inequality can be disproven. This can happen if there is a counterexample that shows the inequality is not always true. For example, if an inequality states that all whole numbers are even, but there is a counterexample of an odd number, then the inequality is disproven.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
872
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
851
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top