Can the Sum of Powers Over an Integral Approach 1 as n Tends to Infinity?

  • Thread starter eljose
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses a method for proving the equality of a sequence and an integral for n approaching infinity, where p is a positive exponent. The method involves drawing rectangles under the graph of y=x^p and using the integral comparison test. It is mentioned that the sum of consecutive kth powers can be easily proven using the binomial theorem and induction. A reference for this proof is provided.
  • #1
eljose
492
0
i would like to know how to prove this equality:

[tex]\frac{1+2^p+3^p+...+n^p}{\int_0^{n}dxx^p}\rightarrow{1} [/tex]

for [tex]n\rightarrow{\infty} [/tex] of course p>0

i don,t know if is repeated (sorry in that case)..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Draw the graph of y= xp. Now draw a series of rectangles, base from x= 1 to 2, height 1p= 1, base 2 to 3, height 2p, etc. Observe that each rectangle lies under the graph and so the total area of the rectangles (up to x= n) is less than the area under the curve. That is, 1 is an upper bound for the sequence as n goes to infinity. It should not be difficult to show that the sequence is increasing.
 
  • #3
Go look at the integral comparison test. The method of proof is exactly what you want. (And what Integral describes)

But, the sum is "well-known" (for integer exponents):

[tex]1^k + 2^k + 3^k + \cdots + n^k = \frac{n^{k+1} }{k+1} + \frac{n^k}{2} + O(n^{k-1})[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #4
it is easy to prove the sum ^k + ...+n^k, equals n^(k+1)/[k+1] + O(n^k), by induction.
just use the binomial theorem on (a+1)^(k+1) - a^(k+1). Expand and add up over all a=1,...,n.
you get a telescoping sum that shows (n+1)^(k+1) - 1^(k+1)
= (k+1) )(1^k +...+n^k) + sums of all lower powers of integers summed from 1 to n.
QED.
reference, p.27 of courant's calculus book vol 1, in the precalculus section.
 

FAQ: Can the Sum of Powers Over an Integral Approach 1 as n Tends to Infinity?

How do you prove something scientifically?

To prove something scientifically, you must conduct experiments and gather data that supports your hypothesis. This data must be analyzed and reproduced by others in the scientific community to ensure its validity.

Can you prove something with 100% certainty?

No, scientific proof is never absolute. Theories and hypotheses can always be revised or disproven with new evidence. However, with enough supporting evidence, a scientific claim can be considered highly likely or accepted as true.

What makes scientific proof different from other types of proof?

Scientific proof is based on empirical evidence and follows the scientific method. It involves making observations, forming hypotheses, and conducting experiments to test those hypotheses. It also requires peer review and reproducibility to ensure the validity of the results.

Can one study or experiment prove a scientific theory?

No, scientific theories are supported by multiple studies and experiments. One study or experiment may provide evidence for a theory, but it cannot prove it on its own. The strength of a theory lies in the consistency and reproducibility of its supporting evidence.

How can you tell if something has been scientifically proven?

Scientific proof is determined by the weight of evidence and the consensus of the scientific community. If a theory or claim has been extensively tested and accepted by the majority of scientists, it can be considered proven. However, the possibility of new evidence or alternative explanations should always be considered.

Back
Top