Can there be negative dimensions in our world?

[setuxas]

I've been reading all about dimensions and started theorising myself , can there be something like -1D? The theory I came up is this:

The Minus Dimensions don't have an object (it doesn't exist), but it's form is created by the location, which is other specific positive D objects. For example: -1D - A blank line surrounded by other lines which exist. -2D - A non-existant form of a 2D square created by other 2D squares, which exist. -3D - A non existent 3D object surrounded by other 3D objects. The most important rule is that the non-existant object must be the center of the created location.

Basicly this would explain a lot of other events.

Tell me what you think

- Liutauras

 

[magpies]

(it doesn't exist) about sums it up.

 

[BobG]

Objects (and things like force and momentum) exist and are what they are.

Dimensions just provide a way to describe objects (and other things). Any dimensions necessary and useful to describe the real world can be created by the person doing the explaining - provided they're understandable and actually make the description better.

So your idea wouldn't be a theory; it would be a method. It isn't totally clear how your method would explain other events, though. (Don't fall in love with unique methods that just don't add much to what you're trying to say or acocmplish.)

 

[Redbelly98]

Thread locked.

The main purpose of Physics Forums is to teach and discuss the current state of knowledge in science, math, and technology; personal theories and non-mainstream speculation are against our guidelines.

 

[LudusRex]

I find this theory intriguing and thought-provoking. While it is currently not accepted in mainstream science, the concept of negative dimensions does have some basis in theoretical physics. In string theory, for example, there are theories that suggest the existence of extra dimensions beyond the three spatial dimensions we are familiar with. These extra dimensions may have negative values, but they are still considered to be part of our physical world.

However, the idea of negative dimensions as described in your theory is still highly speculative and would require further evidence and research to be considered a valid scientific concept. It is important to note that in science, theories must be supported by empirical evidence and tested through experimentation.

Additionally, the concept of a non-existent object creating a form through its location is difficult to grasp and would require a deeper understanding of the nature of reality and existence. It is also worth considering how this theory fits into our current understanding of physics and how it can be tested and verified.

Overall, your theory raises interesting questions and possibilities, but it would require more research and evidence to be considered a valid scientific concept. As scientists, we must continue to question and explore new ideas, but also remain grounded in empirical evidence and established scientific principles.