Can time be the cause of gravity's weakness and nonpolarity?

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of gravity disappearing into the distant future and being affected by time as an irreversible force. It also brings up the idea of dark energy being a stronger, space-only warping force that is not affected by time. However, the speaker states that none of these theories are possible without proper scientific evidence and peer-reviewed literature. The thread is then closed, but may be reopened if relevant publications are provided.
  • #1
Martin Sallberg
20
0
Is it possible that the reason why gravity is the weakest fundamental force is because it is disappearing into the distant future? Similar to string theory's notion that gravity dissipates into other dimensions, only in this case it is time it dissipates through? Radon 220 and radium 224 nuclei are known to take on a pear-like shape that the notion of time as an illusion cannot explain. Is it mathematically possible that truly irreversible time may cause most of gravity to disappear into the distant future and leaving only a small part to affect the present? Also, it is mathematically possible that truly irreversible time can make an otherwise polar force that interacts with it non-polar and additive, allowing gravity's interaction with time (such as time dilation) to explain why it is not polar like, say, electromagnetism which does not affect time?

Given that dark energy affects only space and not time (the accelerating expansion of the Universe is an expansion of only space, not of space-time as it would cause time dilation) and is negative (gravity as we know it can only be positive), is it possible that dark energy is an example of a space only warping force that is stronger than gravity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
None of that is possible.
 
  • #3
Vanadium 50 said:
None of that is possible.
Can you provide the mathematical proof that it is fundamentally impossible?
 
  • #4
That is not how physics works. You have to show that some approach has some merit (in this case: give peer-reviewed literature discussing it). Just putting some words together is not a hypothesis.

I closed the thread. If you have publications discussing something like this, please send it to me, then I will reopen the thread.
 

FAQ: Can time be the cause of gravity's weakness and nonpolarity?

Can time affect the strength of gravity?

Yes, time can affect the strength of gravity. According to Einstein's theory of general relativity, time and space are intertwined and can be affected by the presence of massive objects. This means that the passage of time can also affect the strength of gravity.

How does time affect the polarity of gravity?

Time does not directly affect the polarity of gravity. Gravity is a fundamental force of nature and its polarity remains constant. However, the effects of time on the fabric of space-time can indirectly impact the behavior of gravity and its polarity.

Is time the only factor that affects gravity's weakness and nonpolarity?

No, time is not the only factor that affects the weakness and nonpolarity of gravity. Other factors, such as the mass and distance between objects, also play a significant role in determining the strength and polarity of gravity.

Can time be manipulated to change the strength and polarity of gravity?

Currently, there is no evidence to suggest that time can be manipulated to directly change the strength and polarity of gravity. However, the theory of general relativity does allow for the possibility of manipulating space-time, which could indirectly impact the behavior of gravity.

How does the concept of time dilation relate to the weakness and nonpolarity of gravity?

Time dilation, the stretching or slowing down of time, is a phenomenon predicted by Einstein's theory of relativity. It can occur in the presence of massive objects and can impact the behavior of gravity. However, the exact relationship between time dilation and the weakness and nonpolarity of gravity is still a subject of ongoing research and debate.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
779
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top