Can we prove $3^n > n^3$ for all $n \geqslant 4$ using induction?

In summary, induction is a form of logical reasoning that involves using specific instances to make a general statement or prediction about a larger set of data. It differs from deduction in that it starts with specific examples rather than a general statement. Some common errors in induction include hasty generalizations and confirmation bias. In scientific research, induction is often used to form hypotheses that are then tested through experimentation. However, induction also has limitations as it relies on probability and can be influenced by human biases.
  • #1
SweatingBear
119
0
We wish to show that $3^n > n^3 \, , \ \forall n \geqslant 4 $. Base case $n = 4$ yields

$3^4 = 81 > 4^3 = 64 $

Assume the inequality holds for $n = p $ i.e. $3^p > p^3$ for $p \geqslant 4$. Then

$3^{p+1} > 3p^3$

$p \geqslant 4$ implies $3p^3 \geq 192$, as well as $(p+1)^3 \geqslant 125$. Thus $3p^3 > (p+1)^3$ for $p \geqslant 4$ and we have

$3^{p+1} > 3p^3 > (p+1)^3$

which concludes the proof.

Feedback, forum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
sweatingbear said:
$p \geqslant 4$ implies $3p^3 \geq 192$, as well as $(p+1)^3 \geqslant 125$. Thus $3p^3 > (p+1)^3$ for $p \geqslant 4$ and we have

One question :

if x>5 and y>2 then x>y ?
 
  • #3
ZaidAlyafey said:
One question :

if x>5 and y>2 then x>y ?

I was actually a bit uncertain about that. How else would one go about?
 
  • #4
We need to prove that

\(\displaystyle 3^{p+1}> (p+1)^3\) assuming that \(\displaystyle 3^p>p^3\,\,\,\, \forall p\geq 4\)

\(\displaystyle \tag{1} 3^{p+1}>3p^3\geq p^3+p^3\)

Lemma :

\(\displaystyle p^3-3p^2-3p-1 \geq 0\)

Take the derivative

\(\displaystyle 3p^2-6p-3 =3(p^2-2p-1)=3(p^2-2p+1-2)=3(p-1)^2-6\)

The function is positive for $p=4$ and increases for \(\displaystyle p\geq 4\) so the lemma is satisfied .

Hence we have

\(\displaystyle p^3 \geq 3p^2+3p+1 \,\,\,\,\forall p\geq 4\)

Using this in (1) we get

\(\displaystyle 3^{p+1}>p^3+3p^2+3p+1=(p+1)^3 \,\,\,\square\)
 
  • #5
Here is how I would do this proof:

(inductive step only).

Suppose that \(\displaystyle 3^k > k^3, k > 3\).

Then:

\(\displaystyle 3^{k+1} = 3(3^k) > 3k^3\).

If we can show that:

\(\displaystyle 3k^3 > (k+1)^3\), we are done.

Equivalently, we must show that:

\(\displaystyle 3k^3 > k^3 + 3k^2 + 3k + 1\), so that:

\(\displaystyle 2k^3 - 3k^2 - 3k - 1 > 0\).

Note that \(\displaystyle 2k^3 - 3k^2 - 3k - 1 > 2k^3 - 3k^2 - 5k + 3\)

if \(\displaystyle 2k - 4 > 0\), that is if \(\displaystyle k > 2\), which is true.

But \(\displaystyle 2k^2 - 3k^2 - 5k + 3 = (2k - 1)(k^2 - k - 3)\).

Now \(\displaystyle 2k - 1 > 0\) for any \(\displaystyle k > 0\), so we are down to showing

\(\displaystyle k^2 - k - 3 > 0\) whenever \(\displaystyle k > 3\).

Since \(\displaystyle k^2 - k > 3\) is the same as \(\displaystyle k(k-1) > 3\), we have:

\(\displaystyle k(k-1) > 3(2) = 6 > 3\).

Thus we conclude that \(\displaystyle k^2 - k - 3 > 0\) and so:

\(\displaystyle 3^{k+1} = 3(3^k) > 3k^3 > (k+1)^3\).

With all due respect to Zaid, I wanted to give a purely algebraic proof.
 
  • #6
Deveno said:
Equivalently, we must show that:

\(\displaystyle 3k^3 > k^3 + 3k^2 + 3k + 1\)
Starting from this point, we could continue as follows. We need to show that $3k^2+3k+1<2k^3$.

$3k^2+3k+1<3k^2+3k^2+k^2=7k^2$ since $k>1$. Now, $7k^2<2k^3\iff 7<2k$, and the last inequality is true since $k\ge4$.
 
  • #7
Indeed, we just need to find something that is less than \(\displaystyle 2k^3\) and larger than \(\displaystyle 3k^2 + 3k + 1\) that "factors nice" (so we can apply what we know specifically about \(\displaystyle k\)). Very nice solution!
 

FAQ: Can we prove $3^n > n^3$ for all $n \geqslant 4$ using induction?

What is induction in proof critique?

Induction is a method of logical reasoning in which conclusions are drawn based on a set of observed patterns or instances. It involves using specific examples to make a general statement or prediction about a larger set of data.

How does induction differ from deduction?

Unlike deduction, which uses a general statement to draw specific conclusions, induction starts with specific instances and uses them to make a general statement. Induction is not considered as strong of a form of reasoning as deduction, as it relies on probability rather than certainty.

What are some common errors in induction?

One common error in induction is the "hasty generalization," in which a general statement is made based on too few examples. Another error is "confirmation bias," in which someone only looks for examples that support their existing beliefs.

How is induction used in scientific research?

In scientific research, induction is often used to form hypotheses based on observed patterns or data. These hypotheses are then tested through experimentation and observation to determine their validity. If the results of the experiments support the hypothesis, it can be considered a reliable explanation for the observed patterns.

What are the limitations of induction?

Induction is limited by the fact that it relies on probability rather than certainty. This means that even if a hypothesis is supported by many examples, it is still possible for it to be proven false in the future. Additionally, induction can also be influenced by human biases and errors, leading to incorrect conclusions.

Back
Top