MHB Can You Find the Angle in This Isosceles Triangle Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a geometric problem involving an isosceles triangle ABC with a base angle of 80 degrees. A point D is located on side AB such that AD equals BC, and point E is on ray CB such that AC equals EC. Participants are encouraged to solve the problem and share their solutions. The original poster expresses interest in the challenge but has not yet found a solution. The problem invites collaborative problem-solving within the forum.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hello MHB, I saw one question that really tickles my intellectual fancy and because of the limited spare time that I have, I could not say I have solved it already! But, I will most definitely give the question more thought and will post back if I find a good solution to it.

Here goes the question...and if this question intrigues you, please feel free to try it and in case you have solved it, please share it with us!

In the isosceles triangle $ABC$, the angle at the base $BC$ is equal to $80^{\circ}$. On the side $AB$ the point $D$ is chosen such that $AD=BC$ and on the ray $CB$ the point $E$ is chosen such that $AC=EC$. Find the angle $EDC$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[TIKZ]\coordinate [label=left:$A$] (A) at (80:9) ;
\coordinate [label=below:$B$] (B) at (0,0) ;
\coordinate [label=below:$C$] (C) at (3,0) ;
\coordinate [label=left:$D$] (D) at (80:6) ;
\coordinate [label=below:$E$] (E) at (-6,0) ;
\draw (B) -- node[ below right ]{$x$}(A) -- node[ below right ]{$x$}(C) -- node[ below ]{$x$}(E) -- node[ above ]{$y$}(D) -- (C) ;
\draw (-5.25,0.25) node{$40^\circ$} ;
\draw (0.5,0.25) node{$80^\circ$} ;
\draw (0.5,5) node{$40^\circ$} ;[/TIKZ]
Let $x = AB = AC = EC$ and let $y = ED$.

In the isosceles triangle $ABC$, $BC = 2x\cos80^\circ$. Since $AD = BC$, it follows that $EB = DB = x(1 - 2\cos80^\circ)$. Thus the triangle $DBE$ is isosceles, and since the apex angle at $B$ is $100^\circ$ it follows that the base angles $DEB$ and $EDB$ are both $40^\circ$.

By the sine rule in the triangle $DBE$, $\dfrac{DE}{\sin100^\circ} = \dfrac{EB}{\sin40^\circ}$, or $\dfrac{y}{\sin80^\circ} = \dfrac{x(1 - 2\cos80^\circ)}{\sin40^\circ}$. Therefore $$y\sin40^\circ = x\sin80^\circ(1 - 2\cos80^\circ) = 2x\sin40^\circ\cos40^\circ\bigl(1 - 2(2\cos^240^\circ - 1)\bigr),$$ $$y = 2x\cos40^\circ(3 - 4\cos^240^\circ) = -2x(4\cos^340^\circ - 3\cos40^\circ).$$ The formula $\cos3\theta = 4\cos^3\theta - 3\cos\theta$ shows that $4\cos^340^\circ - 3\cos40^\circ = \cos120^\circ = -\cos60^\circ = -\frac12$. Therefore $y = -2x\bigl(-\frac12\bigr) = x$. So $ED = EC$ and the triangle $EDC$ is isosceles. The angle at the apex $E$ is $40^\circ$ and so the base angles (one of which is $EDC$) are $70^\circ$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top