Can You Prove These Inequalities for Real Numbers a, b, and c?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter anemone
  • Start date
In summary, "POTW" stands for "Problem of the Week" and is a weekly problem or puzzle used in educational settings to challenge students. The statement in question involves a sequence of numbers that increase in size, and is relevant to science as it involves mathematical proof, a crucial aspect of the scientific method. The purpose of proving this statement is to demonstrate the validity and accuracy of the given sequence, and it can have various applications in different fields of science as well as in real-life situations.
  • #1
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
3,883
115
Here is this week's POTW:

-----

Let $a<b<c$ be real numbers such that $a+b+c=6$ and $ab+bc+ca=9$. Prove that $0<a<1<b<3<c<4$.

-----

 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi all!

Just to let you all know that I will extend the deadline to solve last week's POTW (which actually due today) to next week, with the great hope to receive any submission of solution from the members! (Happy)
 
  • #3
Let $abc=k$, this makes $a,\,b$ and $c$ become the roots of the cubic equation $x^3-6x^2+9x-k=0$.

The cubic equation can be rewritten as $x(x-3)^2=k$.

Plot the graph of $f(x)=x(x-3)^2$ and the horizontal line of $y=k$ with condition $0<k<4$ on the same diagram. Since the roots are real, the line $y=k$ can only be moved in such a way that it always cuts the curve at 3 distinct points in such a way that $0<a<1<b<3<c<4$.

[TIKZ][scale=3]
\draw[help lines] (0,0) grid (5,4);
\draw[thick,->] (0,0) -- (4.5,0) node[anchor=north west] {x axis};
\draw[thick,->] (0,0) -- (0,4.5) node[anchor=south east] {y axis};
\draw[ domain=-0.2:4, samples=100] plot (\x,\x^3 - 6*\x^2 +9*\x);
\draw (0,3.2) -- (4,3.2);
\foreach \x in {0,1,2,3,4}
\draw (\x cm,1pt) -- (\x cm,-1pt) node[anchor=north] {$\x$};
\foreach \y in {0,1,2,3,4}
\draw (1pt,\y cm) -- (-1pt,\y cm) node[anchor=east] {$\y$};
\node at (3.6,2) {\large $y=f(x)$};
\node at (4.2,3.2) {\large $y=k$};
\draw[ densely dashed,color=blue] (0,4) -- (4,4);
\draw[ densely dashed,color=blue] (4,0) -- (4,4);
\draw[ densely dashed,color=blue] (0.52,0) -- (0.52,3.2);
\draw[ densely dashed,color=blue] (1,0) -- (1,3.2);
\draw[ densely dashed,color=blue] (1.58,0) -- (1.58,3.2);
\draw[ densely dashed,color=blue] (3.9,0) -- (3.9,3.2);
\node at (0.52,-0.08) {$a$};
\node at (1.58,-0.08) {$b$};
\node at (3.9,-0.08) {$c$};
[/TIKZ]
 

FAQ: Can You Prove These Inequalities for Real Numbers a, b, and c?

What does "POTW" stand for?

"POTW" stands for "Problem of the Week". It is a weekly problem presented by a math and science website called "Mathematics Stack Exchange".

What does the notation "0 < a < 1 < b < 3 < c < 4" mean?

This notation means that the variables a, b, and c are all within a specific range, with a being greater than 0 and less than 1, b being greater than 1 and less than 3, and c being greater than 3 and less than 4.

What is the significance of proving this statement?

This statement is significant because it demonstrates the concept of nested inequalities and how multiple variables can be constrained within a specific range. It also allows for the exploration of various mathematical techniques and strategies for proving inequalities.

Can you provide an example of how this statement can be proven?

One possible way to prove this statement is by using the transitive property of inequalities. This means showing that if a < b and b < c, then a < c. In this case, we can show that 0 < 1 < 3 < 4, which satisfies the given conditions.

Are there any real-world applications of this statement?

While this statement may not have a direct real-world application, the concept of nested inequalities is commonly used in fields such as economics, engineering, and computer science. It can also be applied in problem-solving and decision-making processes that involve multiple variables and constraints.

Back
Top