Can You Prove This Fraction Sequence is Less Than 1/1000?

In summary, "Inequality Challenge IV" is a scientific experiment conducted by a team of scientists and researchers from various institutions to study the effects of economic inequality on society. The level of inequality is measured using the Gini coefficient, and the potential benefits include providing insights on the impact of inequality on different aspects of society and informing policies to address it. The results of the experiment can be applied to real-life situations to guide policymakers and stimulate further research and discussions.
  • #1
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
3,883
115
Show that $\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot\dfrac{3}{4}\cdot\dfrac{5}{6} \cdots\dfrac{999999}{1000000}<\dfrac{1}{1000}$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
We claim that

[tex]\frac{1 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdots (2n-1)}{2 \cdot 4 \cdot 6\cdots (2n)} \leq \frac{1}{\sqrt{3n+1}}[/tex]

for all positive integers n. The result then follows by setting n = 500000 and observing that

[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{1500001}} < \frac{1}{1000}[/tex]

The claim is proved by induction on n.
For n = 1, the claim is obvious.
Assume the claim is true for n. We have to show that

[tex]\frac{1 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdots (2n-1)(2n+1)}{2 \cdot 4 \cdot 6\cdots (2n)(2n+2)} \leq \frac{1}{\sqrt{3n+4}}[/tex]

But

[tex]\frac{1 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdots (2n-1)(2n+1)}{2 \cdot 4 \cdot 6\cdots(2n)(2n+2)}=\frac{1 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdots (2n-1)}{2 \cdot 4 \cdot 6\cdots (2n)} \frac{2n+1}{2n+2}\leq\frac{1}{\sqrt{3n+1}}\frac{2n+1}{2n+2}[/tex]

So we have to show that

[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{3n+1}}\frac{2n+1}{2n+2}\leq \frac{1}{\sqrt{3n+4}}[/tex]

This inequality follows by clearing fractions, squaring both sides and simplifying. The result is

[tex]19n \leq 20n[/tex]

which holds for all positive n. This completes the proof of the claim.
 
  • #3
As reported in...

http://mathhelpboards.com/questions-other-sites-52/unsolved-analysis-number-theory-other-sites-7479-4.html#post40097

... the the explicit expression of the sequence is...

$\displaystyle a_{n} = \prod_{k=1}^{n} (1 - \frac{1}{2\ k})\ (1)$

... and it is the solution of the difference equation...$\displaystyle a_{n+1} = a_{n}\ (1 - \frac{1}{2\ n}),\ a_{1}=1\ (2)$

The (2) is related to the ODE...

$\displaystyle y^{\ '} = - \frac{y}{2\ x}\ (3)$

... the solution of which is $\displaystyle y = \frac{c}{\sqrt{x}}$, so that we can suppose $\displaystyle a_{n} \sim r_{n}= \frac{c}{\sqrt{n}}$. If we suppose that $r_{500000}= \frac{1}{1000}$ then is $\displaystyle c = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$. In the following table the first values os $a_{n}$ and $r_{n}$ are reported... $a_{1}= 1,\ r_{1} = .70710678...$

$a_{2}= .5,\ r_{2} = .5$

$a_{3}= .375,\ r_{3} = .40824829...$

$a_{4}= .3125,\ r_{4} = .35355339...$

$a_{5}= .273438...,\ r_{5} = .31627766...$

$a_{6}= .246094...,\ r_{6} = .2886751...$

$a_{7}= .225586...,\ r_{7} = .2672612...$

$a_{8}= .209473...,\ r_{8} = .25$

$a_{9}= .196381...,\ r_{9} = .2357022...$

$a_{10}= .185471...,\ r_{10} = .2236067...$

It is clear from the table that for n 'large enough' the relative increments of the $a_{n}$ and $r_{n}$ are pratically the same and that is verified considering that is... $\displaystyle \frac{a_{n+1}}{a_{n}} = 1 - \frac{1}{2\ n}$ $\displaystyle \frac{r_{n+1}}{r_{n}} = \sqrt{1 - \frac{1}{n}} = 1 - \frac{1}{2\ n} - \frac{1}{8\ n^{2}} - ...\ (4)$... so that we can conclude that is $\displaystyle a_{500000} < r_{500000} = \frac{1}{1000}$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #4
Thanks for participating to both of you, Petek and chisigma! Your induction method looks nice and great, Petek!

@chisigma, your solution post reminds me of this thread(http://mathhelpboards.com/discrete-mathematics-set-theory-logic-15/find-a_%7B100000%7D-8448.html)! Bravo, chisigma!:)

Solution provided by other:

Let $x=\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot\dfrac{3}{4}\cdot\dfrac{5}{6} \cdots\dfrac{999999}{1000000}$.

Thus, what we need to show is that $x<\dfrac{1}{1000}$.

Now, note that

$x^2=\dfrac{1^2}{2^2}\cdot\dfrac{3^2}{4^2}\cdot \dfrac{5^2}{6^2} \cdots\dfrac{999999^2}{1000000^2}$

Since decreasing the denominator of a fraction makes it bigger, we have that

$\dfrac{1^2}{2^2}\le \dfrac{1^2}{2^2-1}= \dfrac{1^2}{(2-1)(2+1)}=\dfrac{1^2}{1\cdot3}$

$\dfrac{3^2}{4^2}\le \dfrac{3^2}{4^2-1}= \dfrac{3^2}{(4-1)(4+1)}=\dfrac{3^2}{3\cdot5}$

$\dfrac{5^2}{6^2}\le \dfrac{5^2}{6^2-1}= \dfrac{5^2}{(6-1)(6+1)}=\dfrac{5^2}{5\cdot7}$

$\vdots\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\vdots$

$\dfrac{999999^2}{1000000^2}\le \dfrac{999999^2}{1000000^2-1}= \dfrac{999999^2}{(1000000-1)(1000000+1)}=\dfrac{999999^2}{999999\cdot1000001}$

Multiplying all these together we get

$x^2<\dfrac{1}{1000001}<\dfrac{1}{1000000}$

Now, taking square roof of both sides we obtain

$x<\dfrac{1}{1000}$ or

$\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot\dfrac{3}{4}\cdot\dfrac{5}{6} \cdots\dfrac{999999}{1000000}<\dfrac{1}{1000}$ (Q.E.D.)
 
Last edited:
  • #5


There are a few ways to approach this problem. One way is to recognize that each fraction in the product is less than 1, and as the denominators increase, the fractions get closer and closer to 1. Therefore, the product must be less than 1.

Another approach is to use mathematical induction. Let's consider the first few terms of the product:
$\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot\dfrac{3}{4}\cdot\dfrac{5}{6}=\dfrac{5}{16}$
$\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot\dfrac{3}{4}\cdot\dfrac{5}{6}\cdot\dfrac{7}{8}=\dfrac{35}{128}$
$\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot\dfrac{3}{4}\cdot\dfrac{5}{6}\cdot\dfrac{7}{8}\cdot\dfrac{9}{10}=\dfrac{315}{1024}$

We can see that each subsequent term in the product is decreasing, and the numerator is increasing. We can then use mathematical induction to prove that this pattern continues for all terms up to $\dfrac{999999}{1000000}$.

Base case: For $n=1$, we have $\dfrac{1}{2}<\dfrac{1}{1000}$, which is true.

Inductive step: Assume that for some $n=k$, $\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot\dfrac{3}{4}\cdot\dfrac{5}{6} \cdots\dfrac{2k-1}{2k}<\dfrac{1}{1000}$

For $n=k+1$, we have $\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot\dfrac{3}{4}\cdot\dfrac{5}{6} \cdots\dfrac{2k-1}{2k}\cdot\dfrac{2k+1}{2k+2}<\dfrac{1}{1000}\cdot\dfrac{2k+1}{2k+2}$

Since $\dfrac{2k+1}{2k+2}<1$, we can multiply both sides by $\dfrac{1}{1000}$ without changing the direction of the inequality.

Therefore, $\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot\dfrac{3}{4}\cdot\dfrac{5}{6} \cdots\d
 

FAQ: Can You Prove This Fraction Sequence is Less Than 1/1000?

What is "Inequality Challenge IV"?

"Inequality Challenge IV" is a scientific experiment designed to study the effects of economic inequality on society. It involves creating a simulation of a society with varying levels of income inequality and observing the outcomes.

Who is conducting the "Inequality Challenge IV" experiment?

The "Inequality Challenge IV" experiment is being conducted by a team of scientists and researchers from various academic institutions and organizations.

How is the level of income inequality measured in the experiment?

The level of income inequality in the experiment is measured using the Gini coefficient, which is a statistical measure of income distribution. A higher Gini coefficient indicates a greater level of inequality.

What are the potential benefits of conducting this experiment?

The "Inequality Challenge IV" experiment can provide insights on the impact of income inequality on various aspects of society, such as social cohesion, economic growth, and overall well-being. This can inform policies and interventions aimed at reducing inequality.

How can the results of the experiment be applied to real-life situations?

The results of the "Inequality Challenge IV" experiment can inform policymakers, economists, and other stakeholders on the potential consequences of income inequality and guide the development of strategies to address it. It can also stimulate further research and discussions on the topic.

Back
Top