MHB Can You Simplify the Fraction 2h/h2 + 2h + 2 by Cancelling Out 2h?

  • Thread starter Thread starter coolbeans33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction Simplify
AI Thread Summary
The fraction 2h/h² + 2h + 2 cannot be simplified by canceling out 2h. The expression simplifies to 2(1/h + h + 1), but 2h does not cancel out in this form. If the expression were 2h/(h² + 2h + 2), it still would not simplify further. Therefore, the initial assumption about canceling 2h is incorrect. The discussion clarifies the importance of correctly interpreting the fraction for simplification.
coolbeans33
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
2h/h2 + 2h + 2

does the 2h cancel out?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
coolbeans33 said:
2h/h2 + 2h + 2

does the 2h cancel out?

It's hard to see what you mean but I'm inclined to say the answer is no.

As you've written it we have:
$$\frac{2h}{h^2} + 2h + 2 = 2\left(\dfrac{1}{h} + h + 1\right)$$

but you can't cancel $$2h$$

If you meant $$\frac{2h}{h^2+2h+2}$$ then it won't cancel any further
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top