Can you use regularized sums to manipulate divergent integrals in QFT?

  • Thread starter lokofer
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Strange
In summary, Hardy's book "divergent series" states that if the sum of a divergent series is 0, then the summation must be performed in the sense of an integrand over a sequence of cosines. However, this is not always true - for a certain class of test functions, the infinite sum of these operators does, in fact, converge to the operator -1/2 that maps k(x) \rightarrow \int_0^b k(x) (-1/2) \, dx.
  • #1
lokofer
106
0
According to Hardy's book "divergent series" the sum:

[tex] g(x)=1/2+cos(x)+cos(2x)+cos(3x)+... [/tex] has sum equal to 0 (¡¡¡¡¡¡) then if we integrate in the sense:

[tex] \int_{0}^{b}f(x)\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}cos(nx) dx \rightarrow (-1/2)\int_{0}^{b}f(x)dx [/tex] :rolleyes: :rolleyes: since the sum "regularized" has the value 0..but is this true?...can you manipulate divergent series giving them a "sum" although they diverge and even in this case that is clearly 0?..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You're omitting a lot of details; if you paid attention to them you might have your answer already. :wink:

I'll assume Hardy knows what he's talking about and that you have faithfully represented him... and I'll try and guess at what the missing details are.


The sum of functions

[tex]\sum_{n = 0}^{+\infty} \cos nx[/tex]

certainly doesn't exist. But that doesn't mean you can't do some other operation to this series to get a number. I'll select a certain class of "test functions", and define a "regularizaion" operation (which I'll call [itex]\mathcal{R}\sum[/itex]) on a sequence [itex]f_n[/itex] of functions to be:

[tex]\mathcal{R}\sum_{n = 0}^{+\infty} f_n(x) = g(x)[/tex]

if and only if

[tex]\sum_{n = 0}^{+\infty} \int_0^b k(x) f_n(x) \, dx = \int_0^b k(x) g(x) \, dx[/tex]

for every "test function" [itex]k[/itex].




The other way I could interpret this is due to an annoying notation often used in physics that is rarely explicitly explained. If a physicist wrote what you had written, I would expect that they meant [itex]\cos nx[/itex] does not refer to the cosine function, but instead to the operator that maps:

[tex]k(x) \rightarrow \int_0^b k(x) \cos nx \, dx[/tex]

Then, I imagine for a certain class of "test functions", the infinite sum of these operators does, in fact, converge to the operator [itex]-1/2[/itex] that maps

[tex]k(x) \rightarrow \int_0^b k(x) (-1/2) \, dx[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #3
I was referring to a sum over "cosines"...what i have done comes from the fact that "Poisson sum formula"..is:

[tex] \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}f(n)= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)(1+ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}Cos(nx)) [/tex]

So from this you could "Suppose"(¿?) that the sum of cosines tends to -1/2 .. in fact i think you can deduce this identity by taking the "Laplace discrete trasnform:

[tex] \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}cos(na)e^{-sn} [/tex] and take the limit s-->0+ (tends to 0 by the right side) to get this identity...my objective in proposing that is to get a "resummation" method for divergent integrals that appear in QFT theory (Quantum mehcanics) of the form:

[tex] \int_{0}^{\infty}dx x^{m} [/tex] m>0 or m=0 so you can use "Poisson sum formula" to get a relation between these integrals and the sum:

[tex] 1+2^{m}+3^{m}+.... =\zeta (-m) [/tex] m>0
 

FAQ: Can you use regularized sums to manipulate divergent integrals in QFT?

What is strange resummation?

Strange resummation is a mathematical technique used in theoretical physics to calculate the properties of particles and their interactions. It is specifically used in the field of quantum chromodynamics (QCD), which studies the strong nuclear force that holds particles together.

How does strange resummation work?

Strange resummation involves organizing and re-summing an infinite series of terms in a mathematical equation. This allows for more precise calculations and predictions of particle properties, particularly those involving the strange quark, which is one of the six types of quarks that make up protons and neutrons.

What are the benefits of using strange resummation?

The use of strange resummation allows for more accurate calculations in QCD, which is important for understanding the behavior of subatomic particles. It also helps to reduce uncertainties in theoretical predictions, which can then be compared to experimental data to test the validity of the theory.

Are there any limitations to strange resummation?

One limitation of strange resummation is that it can be technically challenging and time-consuming to perform the calculations. It also requires a deep understanding of QCD and its mathematical framework. Additionally, the accuracy of the results can be affected by the specific assumptions and approximations made in the resummation process.

How is strange resummation related to other resummation techniques?

Strange resummation is just one type of resummation technique used in theoretical physics. Other common techniques include perturbative resummation and soft-collinear resummation. Each technique is tailored to a specific aspect of a given theory, and they are often used in combination to achieve more precise results.

Similar threads

Back
Top