Canonical quantization with constraints

In summary, the given conversation discusses the Lagrangian of a particle in 2-d with a constraint that it must move on a sphere of radius 'R'. The Lagrange multiplier 'lambda' is used to incorporate the constraint into the Lagrangian. The challenge is to quantize this system, which is explained through Dirac brackets and Dirac-Bergman quantization. A paper by R. Jackiw is also recommended for further understanding.
  • #1
mhill
189
1
let be the Lagrangian [tex] (1/2)m( \dot x ^{2} + \dot y^{2}) - \lambda (x^{2}+y^{2}-R^{2}) [/tex]

with 'lambda' a Lagrange multiplier , and 'R' is the radius of an sphere.

basically , this would be the movement of a particle in 2-d with the constraint that the particle must move on an sphere of radius 'R' , my doubt is that i do not know how to quantizy it since [tex] p_{\lambda}=0 [/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
mhill said:
let be the Lagrangian [tex] (1/2)m( \dot x ^{2} + \dot y^{2}) - \lambda (x^{2}+y^{2}-R^{2}) [/tex]

with 'lambda' a Lagrange multiplier , and 'R' is the radius of an sphere.

basically , this would be the movement of a particle in 2-d with the constraint that the particle must move on an sphere of radius 'R' , my doubt is that i do not know how to quantize it since [tex] p_{\lambda}=0 [/tex]
Have a look at the Wiki page for Dirac brackets and Dirac-Bergman quantization:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_bracket
It explains the essence of constrained quantization.

See also this paper:

R. Jackiw, "(Constrained) Quantization Without Tears", hep-th/9306075
 
  • #3


Canonical quantization with constraints is a powerful tool used in quantum mechanics to study systems with certain constraints. In this case, we have a Lagrangian with a constraint that the particle must move on a sphere of radius R. The Lagrange multiplier \lambda is introduced to enforce this constraint.

In order to quantize this system, we need to first determine the canonical momenta for the coordinates x and y. From the Lagrangian, we can see that the canonical momenta are given by p_x = m\dot x and p_y = m\dot y. However, we also have the constraint p_\lambda = 0, which means that the canonical momentum for \lambda is zero.

To quantize this system, we can use the canonical commutation relations [x,p_x] = i\hbar and [y,p_y] = i\hbar. However, since p_\lambda = 0, there is no corresponding coordinate for \lambda and thus no corresponding canonical commutation relation.

This means that we cannot directly quantize the Lagrange multiplier \lambda. Instead, we can use the constraint to eliminate it from the Hamiltonian and obtain a reduced Hamiltonian that only involves the coordinates x and y. We can then quantize this reduced Hamiltonian using the usual methods.

In summary, canonical quantization with constraints allows us to study systems with constraints in quantum mechanics. In this case, the Lagrange multiplier \lambda is used to enforce the constraint that the particle must move on a sphere of radius R. While we cannot directly quantize \lambda, we can use the constraint to obtain a reduced Hamiltonian and continue with the quantization process.
 

FAQ: Canonical quantization with constraints

What is canonical quantization with constraints?

Canonical quantization with constraints is a mathematical method used in theoretical physics to describe a quantum system with constraints. It involves converting classical variables, such as position and momentum, into operators that satisfy the constraints and satisfy the commutation relations of quantum mechanics.

Why is canonical quantization with constraints important?

Canonical quantization with constraints is important because it allows us to describe the dynamics of physical systems in terms of quantum operators, which are necessary for studying the behavior of particles on a quantum level. It also helps us understand the relationship between classical and quantum systems and how to apply quantum mechanics to constrained systems.

How does canonical quantization with constraints differ from standard canonical quantization?

The main difference between canonical quantization with constraints and standard canonical quantization is that in the former, the classical constraints are taken into account when converting classical variables to quantum operators. This means that the resulting quantum operators will satisfy the classical constraints and will have a more restricted set of commutation relations.

What are the challenges of implementing canonical quantization with constraints?

One of the main challenges of implementing canonical quantization with constraints is finding a consistent and well-defined set of constraints that accurately describe the system. This can be difficult as the constraints must be compatible with each other and with the underlying quantum theory. Another challenge is determining the correct set of quantum operators that satisfy the constraints and have the desired commutation relations.

Can canonical quantization with constraints be applied to all physical systems?

No, canonical quantization with constraints is not applicable to all physical systems. In order for this method to be used, the classical system must have a well-defined set of constraints that can be consistently incorporated into the quantum framework. Additionally, the constraints must be compatible with the underlying quantum theory. This means that some systems, such as those with singularities, may not be amenable to this approach.

Similar threads

Back
Top