Cant get to grips with re arranging formulae

  • Thread starter chaz699
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Formulae
In summary, chaz699 does not understand how to rearrange formulae to get the subject out of the fraction. He needs to get it out of the fraction by moving it to the other side of the equation. Next, he needs to multiply out the brackets. Finally, he needs to solve for the subject.
  • #1
chaz699
19
0

Homework Statement



basically i can't get to grips with rearranging formulae

the question is

make U the subject

fv = uv
u+v

(uv is divded by u+v)




2. The attempt at a solution

i try at making them into brackets etc but i can't get to it


can someone show me step by step how to do it


thanks, much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to Physics Forums.

We won't show you how to do the question, but we will help you do it yourself.

When trying to make something the subject of a formula the best thing to do is to get it out of the fraction. How could you get (u+v) out of the fraction?
 
  • #3
erm, put it on the other side of the formula?
 
  • #4
chaz699 said:
erm, put it on the other side of the formula?
Sounds good. So what does that give you?
 
  • #5
fv(u+v)=uv ?
 
  • #6
chaz699 said:
fv(u+v)=uv ?
Looks good. What do you think the next step would be?
 
  • #7
erm multiply out the brackets?
 
  • #8
chaz699 said:
erm multiply out the brackets?
Sounds good.
 
  • #9
so would it befu+fv+vu+v(squared)=uv
 
  • #10
chaz699 said:
so would it be


fu+fv+vu+v(squared)=uv
Not quite, note that to expand the bracket you would just multiply everything in the bracket by fv. Do you follow?
 
  • #11
i don't quite understand that bit
 
  • #12
chaz699 said:
i don't quite understand that bit
Okay what is 2(3+4)?
 
  • #13
answer is 14
 
  • #14
chaz699 said:
answer is 14
Correct, which is the same as 2x3 + 2x4. Does it make sense now?
 
  • #15
er no hah

i don't see how my answer is wrong
 
  • #16
would it be FVU+FV(squared) = UV
 
  • #17
chaz699 said:
would it be FVU+FV(squared) = UV
Much better :approve:.

What do you suppose the next step is?
 
  • #18
i actually have no idea
 
  • #19
chaz699 said:
i actually have no idea
Try moving all the terms with u in onto the same side.
 
  • #20
so then it would be

fv(squared) = uv-fvu?
 
  • #21
chaz699 said:
so then it would be

fv(squared) = uv-fvu?
Correct, now what would be the next step?
 
  • #22
erm

fv(squared) = u(v-fv)?
 
  • #23
chaz699 said:
erm

fv(squared) = u(v-fv)?
Yup.
 
  • #24
and then

fv(squared) = u
(v-fv)
 
  • #25
chaz699 said:
and then

fv(squared) = u
(v-fv)
Looks good to me
 
  • #26
chaz699, your notation is a little difficult to follow because, in case you do not yet have a way to use mathematical typesetting, you have also not yet learned how to express things in purely text symbolism. Other than that, you need to practice some number properties operations which lead up to your current exercise. (they are often called, "Field Axioms" or "Properties of Equality". ) Are you by some great chance studying Beginning Algebra or Introductory Algebra? Are you studying Pre-Algebra?
 
  • #27
That answer is correct, though the left hand side could be simplified further if you wanted to.
 
  • #28
im studying a level physics (after high school, before university)

i just find rearranging formula hard
 
  • #29
From chaz699,
I am studying a level physics (after high school, before university)

i just find rearranging formula hard

Not sure what that physics course means, but that placement suggests what many might consider to be "introductory physics", requiring basic algebra, ability to use simple Trigonometry, but no use of Calculus; a physics course which does not count toward an engineering or science undergraduate degree. Even so, such an introductory course requires, absolutely requires basic algebra skills, so if you are weak as you seem, you need to thoroughly restudy Introductory and most of Intermediate Algebra BEFORE you study your current apparent Introductory Physics course.

As for typesetting to make your math expressions clearer, one of the Reply To Thread features will give you a set of tools which will let you perform some mathematical typesetting. See the icons above the message field; they give you various symbol control effects. Not all the best typesetting features are available, but you may be able to use TEX or LaTEX, or something.
Superscript: X2
Subscript: X2
 

FAQ: Cant get to grips with re arranging formulae

What are some common reasons why people struggle with rearranging formulae?

Some common reasons for struggling with rearranging formulae include a lack of understanding of basic algebra principles, difficulty visualizing equations, and not knowing which operations to perform first.

Can you provide any tips for effectively rearranging formulae?

Some tips for effectively rearranging formulae include rewriting the equation in a more familiar form, using substitution to simplify the equation, and checking your work by plugging in values for the variables.

How can I improve my overall understanding of algebra and formula rearrangement?

To improve your understanding of algebra and formula rearrangement, it is important to practice regularly and seek help from a tutor or teacher when needed. You can also try breaking down complex equations into smaller steps and using real-life examples to better understand the concepts.

Is there a specific order in which to rearrange a formula?

Yes, there is a specific order in which to rearrange a formula. The general rule is to start by isolating the variable you are solving for, followed by simplifying any remaining terms on the opposite side of the equation.

Are there any online resources or tools that can help with rearranging formulae?

Yes, there are many online resources and tools available to help with rearranging formulae. Some popular options include algebra calculators, online tutorials, and practice problems with step-by-step solutions.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Back
Top