Can't see (LaTex?) equations using google Chrome

In summary, the symbols that look like {}{}{} around terms are supposed to look nice in mathjax, but I'm having trouble seeing them that way. I think it might be because I need to enable java script, but I'm not sure. I also tried the test page that was suggested yesterday, but it didn't work.
  • #1
ArcanaNoir
779
4
So... All that stuff with {}{}{} around it, is supposed to look nice? And here I've been trying to learn to read it like a new syntax. (Which I guess it is.) But I hear it's supposed to look like nice stuff, and I needn't be translating it via my head. I'm using google chrome, and have java script enabled. What else is necessary to see this the way it's intended?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I use Chrome too, and I've found that pages with equations now take a long time to load (like 20 seconds). Is that something you're experiencing, too?
 
  • #3
Not here, that is the first time I found a latex containing post in chrome it took maybe a second. Subsequent tries were much quicker, roughly on par with IE9
 
  • #4
ArcanaNoir said:
So... All that stuff with {}{}{} around it, is supposed to look nice? And here I've been trying to learn to read it like a new syntax. (Which I guess it is.) But I hear it's supposed to look like nice stuff, and I needn't be translating it via my head. I'm using google chrome, and have java script enabled. What else is necessary to see this the way it's intended?

Can you post a link to show us what you are talking about?
 
  • #5
For example,

\int_{0}^{\infty}\mbox{erf}^2(\sqrt{x})\exp(-x)dx

What should I see? I see curly brackets around terms like mbox, erf, sqrt, exp, etc.

I kind of got the impression that this should display as math is handwritten, not with all those curly brackets. Maybe I'm wrong though?
 
  • #6
Please don't start a new thread unless you read the most recent, you might find your questions answered.

It's better to add to a recent thread, and there have been many.

Have you tried using this test page that was suggested yesterday?

tiny-tim said:
Now changed to https://www.physicsforums.com/mathjax/test/preview.html" :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
I did check out that page and I honestly did try to find an answer in the other threads but I couldn't. Sorry if I missed it. That's where I figured enabling java would fix things, but it didn't, and I didn't see anything else to try.

When I put \int_{0}^{\infty}\mbox{erf}^2(\sqrt{x})\exp(-x)dx into the test page (and press enter), nothing changes.
 
  • #8
ArcanaNoir said:
I did check out that page and I honestly did try to find an answer in the other threads but I couldn't. Sorry if I missed it. That's where I figured enabling java would fix things, but it didn't, and I didn't see anything else to try.

When I put \int_{0}^{\infty}\mbox{erf}^2(\sqrt{x})\exp(-x)dx into the test page (and press enter), nothing changes.
Well shoot. I know there was a problem with converting from our old latex to the new mathjax format and I thought someone had found a solution.

Did you look through this thread?

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3380735&postcount=318
 
  • #9
ArcanaNoir said:
For example,

\int_{0}^{\infty}\mbox{erf}^2(\sqrt{x})\exp(-x)dx

What should I see? I see curly brackets around terms like mbox, erf, sqrt, exp, etc.

I kind of got the impression that this should display as math is handwritten, not with all those curly brackets. Maybe I'm wrong though?

You need to type [ tex ] before those symbols, and [ /tex ] right after them -- but without the spaces inside those square brackets. Then you'll see this:

[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty}\mbox{erf}^2(\sqrt{x})\exp(-x)dx[/tex]

If you want the symbols to appear within the same line as regular text, then use [ itex ] and [ /itex ] instead. For example [itex]\mbox{erf}^2(\sqrt{x})[/itex] and stuff like that.
 
  • #10
ArcanaNoir said:
I did check out that page and I honestly did try to find an answer in the other threads but I couldn't. Sorry if I missed it. That's where I figured enabling java would fix things, but it didn't, and I didn't see anything else to try.

When I put \int_{0}^{\infty}\mbox{erf}^2(\sqrt{x})\exp(-x)dx into the test page (and press enter), nothing changes.
The Enter key doesn't do anything. You have to click outside the box. Also, it's javascript that needs to be enabled, not java, but maybe that's what you meant.

You don't need tex or itex tags on that test page, but you need them in forum posts.
 
  • #11
Okay, I poured over that whole thread. I went to this link: https://www.physicsforums.com/mathjax/mjp.html and I could see the quadratic formula nicely. Clicking outside the box on the other test page didn't change anything. Adding [ tex ] [ /tex ] without the spaces didn't change it either, but maybe that's my fault. Yes, I meant java script, and that brings up a point; I'm not savy to the lingo (latex, itex, tex tags, etc). I'm not supposed to download mathjax, am I? I'm clueless here, I really need help. Self exploration is getting me no results. I'm not trying to type this stuff, that can come another day. I just want to see it properly. Curly brackets everywhere I look...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
You don't need to download anything. It should work in any browser with javascript enabled. (For example, you should see an integral sign (and more) in Redbelly98's post above). Does it work when you use another browser? (You should try it even if you don't want to switch, just so we can rule out some theories about why this doesn't work for you).
 
  • #13
It displays correctly for me in IE and Firefox. Sure is pretty. Didn't know what I was missing.
 
  • #14
[itex]\LaTeX[/itex] works fine for me in Google Chrome 12.0.742.124 running on 64-bit Xubuntu 11.04.
 
  • #15
Are there some settings anyone could suggest for me to check?
 
  • #16
ArcanaNoir said:
Are there some settings anyone could suggest for me to check?
Did you see post #9?

I use Chrome and see no problems with Latex.
 
  • #17
ArcanaNoir said:
Are there some settings anyone could suggest for me to check?

Try right-clicking on an equation > Settings > Math Renderer > HTML-CSS

Edit: If you can't get access to the MathJax menu, try deleting the cookies for this site. The settings for MathJax are stored in the mjx.menu cookie I believe.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Post #9 says how to type it, not how to get it to display. I know chrome shows it fine for most people. I'm trying to get some help adjusting MY chrome so I can see it like everyone else.
 
  • #19
Jimmy said:
Try right-clicking on an equation > Settings > Math Renderer > HTML-CSS

Right clicking on the text that should be an equation doesn't return a "settings" option.

Edit: If you can't get access to the MathJax menu, try deleting the cookies for this site. The settings for MathJax are stored in the mjx.menu cookie I believe.

I don't know what this means.
 
  • #20
ArcanaNoir said:
I don't know what this means.
MathJax settings are stored in a cookie. It's possible that the cookie is corrupt or a specific setting is causing a problem.

I don't use Chrome so I do not know how to access cookies on that browser.
 
  • #21
ArcanaNoir said:
Post #9 says how to type it, not how to get it to display. I know chrome shows it fine for most people. I'm trying to get some help adjusting MY chrome so I can see it like everyone else.
Did you customize your chrome? Mine works fine for displaying Latex right out of the box (on two different machines).
 
  • #22
Jimmy said:
MathJax settings are stored in a cookie. It's possible that the cookie is corrupt or a specific setting is causing a problem.

The alleged problematic specific setting is exactly what I am trying to get some help tracking down.

And I didn't customize Chrome that I can remember, but it's possible I changed something back when I was trying to access blackboard.
 
  • #23
Okay I uninstalled Chrome and re-installed. It works now. That ordeal is now behind me. Thanks for your patience.
 

FAQ: Can't see (LaTex?) equations using google Chrome

1. Why can't I see equations in Google Chrome?

There could be a few reasons why you can't see equations in Google Chrome. One possibility is that your browser may not have the necessary plug-ins or extensions to display equations. Another reason could be that the website you are visiting does not support the display of equations in Chrome. It is also possible that there is an issue with your internet connection or browser settings.

2. How can I fix the issue of not being able to see equations in Google Chrome?

To fix this issue, you can try installing a plug-in or extension that supports the display of equations in Chrome. You can also try clearing your browser's cache and cookies, and restarting your browser. If the website you are visiting does not support the display of equations in Chrome, you can try using a different browser or contacting the website's technical support for assistance.

3. Are there any alternative browsers that can display equations better than Google Chrome?

Yes, there are alternative browsers that are specifically designed for displaying equations and mathematical symbols, such as MathJax or MathType. These browsers may be more suitable for viewing and interacting with complex equations and formulas.

4. Can I enable equations in Google Chrome without installing any additional software?

Yes, you can enable equations in Google Chrome by enabling the MathML feature in your browser settings. However, this may not always work for all websites, and you may still need to install a plug-in or extension to fully support the display of equations.

5. Why are some equations displayed correctly in Google Chrome while others are not?

This could be due to compatibility issues between the website and the browser. Some websites may use specific coding or formatting for their equations, which may not be fully supported by Google Chrome. In these cases, it is best to use a browser that is specifically designed for displaying equations, or contact the website's technical support for assistance.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
857
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top