I Carlo Rovelli, loop quantum gravity and point particles

TheHeraclitus
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
How are particles described in loop quantum gravity?
I am reading a popular-science book Reality Is Not What It Seems by Carlo Rovelli, one of the founders of loop quantum gravity.
He writes:
The nodes of the graph represent the discrete packets of volume and, as in the case of photons, can only have certain sizes, which can be computed using Dirac's general quantum equation. Every node n in the graph has its own volume vn: one of the numbers in the spectrum of the volume.
and
The nodes are the elementary quanta of which physical space is made. Every node of the graph is a "quantum particle of space".
and
the gravitational field is space. Space is no longer different from matter. It is one of the "material" components of the world, akin to the electromagnetic field. It is a real entity which undulates, fluctuates, bends and contorts.

So basically, space (spacetime) is just another quantum field like all the others, and the quanta of this field is the nod. Nods have volume, which means they must be extended in dimensions, they must have shape. But all quanta of the other fields, for example photon, electron, quark are described as point particles, they have no volume. It seems absurd to me that every quantum field has point particles except gravitational field which has extended particles.

Rovelli also claims there is minimum length in nature, but point particles would be smaller, they are dimensionless.

So, how does Rovelli and Loop quantum gravity deal with these particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Particles are "pointlike" in standard quantum field theory in the sense that their wavelength can be arbitrarily small. But this is a problem of standard theory, because it leads to UV divergences. According to loop quantum gravity, particles are actually not "pointlike" in that sense, which is a sort of improvement over the standard theory. But note that it is a popular-level explanation, similar to the book you have been reading, so should be taken with a grain of salt.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK, ohwilleke and malawi_glenn
TheHeraclitus said:
Summary: How are particles described in loop quantum gravity?

I am reading a popular-science book Reality Is Not What It Seems by Carlo Rovelli, one of the founders of loop quantum gravity.
He writes:

and

andSo basically, space (spacetime) is just another quantum field like all the others, and the quanta of this field is the nod. Nods have volume, which means they must be extended in dimensions, they must have shape. But all quanta of the other fields, for example photon, electron, quark are described as point particles, they have no volume. It seems absurd to me that every quantum field has point particles except gravitational field which has extended particles.

Rovelli also claims there is minimum length in nature, but point particles would be smaller, they are dimensionless.

So, how does Rovelli and Loop quantum gravity deal with these particles?
One big difficulty with a node-like model of space-time is that this can give rise of Lorentz violations (i.e. deviations from special relativity) if taken too literally. But, this problem is not, in general, a problem with all models in which there is a minimum length that do not rigidly try to fit space-time into a fixed discrete network.
 
TheHeraclitus said:
So basically, space (spacetime) is just another quantum field like all the others
The other fields are defined at each point on spacetime. How can spacetime be a field defined on itself?

TheHeraclitus said:
But all quanta of the other fields, for example photon, electron, quark are described as point particles.
They aren't. Especially the photon! They are states of the relevant quantum field.
TheHeraclitus said:
It seems absurd to me that every quantum field has point particles except gravitational field which has extended particles.
Given it's not part of the theory it may well be absurd!
TheHeraclitus said:
So, how does Rovelli and Loop quantum gravity deal with these particles?
He doesn't have to, as point particles are not part of quantum field theory.
 
Last edited:
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
Hello everyone, I am seeking to better understand the conceptual foundations and potential consequences of "Two-Time Physics" (2T-physics), as developed by Itzhak Bars and others. My interest was sparked by a recent paper that attempts to explain anomalous results in particle physics (apparent superluminal propagation of virtual photons) within the framework of 2T-physics: Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02696 Key quote from the abstract: *"...the problem... can be solved naturally...

Similar threads

Back
Top