- #1
Chacabucogod
- 56
- 0
I was reading Cengel's thermodynamics and noticed that he uses a thought experiment to show that there is no machine that is more efficient than the Carnot reversible machine. He says that both a reversible machine and an irreversible machine are connected to high and low temperature deposits, and that they both receive Qh from the high temperature deposit. He next assumes that the irreversible machine is more efficient than the Carnot machine, and reverses the Carnot machine so that it works as a "refrigerator". The refrigerator is going to be providing Qh to the hot deposit and the irreversible machine will receive Qh so that the deposit can be taken away and both of the machines connected. Then the machines would not have two deposits to complete the cycle and it would not agree with the second law.
Now if I don't assume that the Carnot machine is less efficient than the irreversible machine and reverse it wouldn't the second law be broken too? Or would the Qh that the Carnot machine is providing be less than the required by they second machine?
Thank you
Now if I don't assume that the Carnot machine is less efficient than the irreversible machine and reverse it wouldn't the second law be broken too? Or would the Qh that the Carnot machine is providing be less than the required by they second machine?
Thank you