MHB Cat's question at Yahoo Answers regarding approximate integration

AI Thread Summary
To approximate the total water consumption from the storage tank over 24 hours, the integral T = ∫(0 to 24) C(t) dt is used, where C(t) = 25e^(-0.05(t-15)^2). Since the integrand lacks an elementary anti-derivative, numerical methods like the Midpoint Rule are applied for approximation. Calculations using Wolfram|Alpha with varying sample sizes yield results around 197.728 thousand gallons. The closest answer from the options provided is c) 197.727.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus question: which would best approximate total water consumption of storage tank?


Water is pumped from a storage tank and the flower of water from the tank is given by C(t) = 25e ^-0.05(t-15)^2 thousand gallons per hour, where t is the number of hours since midnight. Which of the following best approximates the total water consumption for one day (in thousands of gallons)?

a) 33.964
b) 164.202
c) 197.727
d) 198.166
e) 202.144

How do you find this answer? Please explain how you work through this problem, thank you!

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Cat,

To find the total consumption $T$ of water for 24 hours, we may state:

$$T=\int_{0}^{24} C(t)\,dt=25\int_{0}^{24} e^{-\frac{(t-15)^2}{20}}\,dt$$

Now, the integrand in this problem does not have an anti-derivative expressible in elementary terms, so we must use either the error function or approximate integration. For simplicity of computation and aided by a computer, let's use the Midpoint Rule and state:

$$T\approx\Delta t\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\left(C\left(\frac{t_{k}+t_{k+1}}{2} \right) \right)$$

Now, we find that:

$$\Delta t=\frac{24}{n}$$

$$t_k=\frac{24k}{n}$$

$$\frac{t_{k}+t_{k+1}}{2}=\frac{12}{n}(2k+1)$$

Hence:

$$T\approx T_n=\frac{600}{n} \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\left(\exp\left(-\frac{\left(\dfrac{12}{n}(2k+1)-15 \right)^2}{20} \right) \right)$$

Now, at the site Wolfram|Alpha: Computational Knowledge Engine I used the command:

sum of (600/n)exp(-((12/n)(2k+1)-15)^2/20) for k=0 to n-1

where I substituted powers of 10 for $n$ and obtained (to 3 decimal places):

[TABLE="class: grid, width: 200"]
[TR]
[TD]$n$[/TD]
[TD]$T_n$[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]197.814[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]100[/TD]
[TD]197.729[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]1000[/TD]
[TD]197.728[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]10000[/TD]
[TD]197.728[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Thus, the choice given by c) is the closest.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top