- #36
Dale
Mentor
- 35,839
- 14,295
That is not a technical objection, it is a semantic complaint. You cannot paint a rose with red color charge, you cannot win a woman's heart with a charm quark, there is no sense in which a top quark is on top, and so forth. You can object to those terms on similar grounds, but those are not technical deficiencies.Andrew Mason said:I disagree. "Centrifugal" has significant technical deficiencies. There is no possible way that the third law pair to the centripetal force on the stone will ever cause the rope to flee the centre of rotation. You have only to look at the Wikipedia article on "centrifugal reaction force" to see the confusion that surrounds that term.
Anyway, we have already had this argument in full previously and I see nothing to be gained by rehashing it.