- #1
oreo
- 81
- 2
Why do we use coefficient of static friction instead of coefficient of kinetic friction in bank curve problems
Bystander said:When the wheels start sliding sideways things start getting complicated, and very exciting. When the part of the wheel in contact with the paved surface/track is not moving relative to the track (static case), things are under control.[/QUOTE
Centripetal force is the force that acts on an object moving in a circular path, pulling it towards the center of the circle. It is necessary to keep the object moving in a circular path and prevent it from flying off in a straight line.
In bank curve problems, the road is usually sloped at an angle to allow vehicles to safely navigate the curve without skidding. Static friction is used in these situations because it provides a force that acts perpendicular to the road surface, helping the vehicle maintain its circular path.
Static friction is a type of force that acts between two surfaces in contact and prevents them from slipping past each other. In bank curve problems, the static friction force acts between the tires of the vehicle and the road surface, providing the necessary centripetal force to keep the vehicle moving in a circular path.
Yes, other types of friction, such as kinetic friction, can also be used in bank curve problems. However, static friction is typically preferred because it is greater than kinetic friction and can provide a larger centripetal force to keep the vehicle on its path.
The angle of the road is determined by considering the speed of the vehicle, the radius of the curve, and the coefficient of static friction between the tires and the road surface. This angle can be calculated using the formula: tanθ = (V^2/rg), where V is the speed of the vehicle, r is the radius of the curve, and g is the acceleration due to gravity.