MHB Challenge problem #5 [Olinguito]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Olinguito
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the definition of the operation A circ B for nonempty sets of complex numbers and the recursive definition of A raised to the power of n. It establishes that for a fixed integer n and any positive integer r, the set of nth roots of unity, denoted as ζ_n, remains unchanged under the defined operation for any r. Consequently, it concludes that ζ_n^{[r]} equals ζ_n^{[1]} for all r. The sum of the elements in ζ_n, which are the roots of the polynomial z^n - 1, is determined to be zero. Thus, the final result is that the sum of all elements in ζ_n^{[r]} is also zero.
Olinguito
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
If $A$ and $B$ are nonempty sets of complex numbers, define
$$A\circ B\ =\ \{z_1z_2:z_1\in A,\,z_2\in B\}.$$
Further define $A^{[1]}=A$ and recursively $A^{[n]}=A^{[n-1]}\circ A$ for $n>1$.

Let $\zeta_n=\{z\in\mathbb C:z^n=1\}$. Given a fixed integer $n\geqslant2$ and any positive integer $r$, find the sum of all the elements in $\zeta_n^{[r]}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[sp]
As $\zeta_n^{[1]}$ is closed under multiplication, $\zeta_n^{[r]}\subset\zeta_n^{[1]}$. On the other hand, as $1\in\zeta_n^{[1]}$, $\zeta_n^{[1]}\subset\zeta_n^{[r]}$.
The conclusion is that $\zeta_n^{[r]}=\zeta_n^{[1]}$ for all $r$. The sum of the elements of that set is the sum of the roots of $z^n-1$, which is $0$.
[/sp]
 
Nice work. (Yes)

Alternatively, note that
$$A\circ B\ =\ \bigcup_{z\in A}\,\{z\}\circ B$$
and $\{\omega\}\circ\zeta_n=\zeta_n$ where $\omega$ is any $n$th root of unity.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
125
Views
19K
3
Replies
100
Views
11K
Replies
42
Views
10K
Back
Top