- #1
Aurelius120
- 251
- 24
- TL;DR Summary
- Why is there a difference between changes in entropy calculated by these methods? One using Gibbs energy and the other using the equation of first law of thermodynamics
So I had to find change in entropy of system in reversible isothermal process.
$$T\Delta S_{sys.}=Q\implies \Delta S_{sys.}=nRln\left(\frac{V_2}{V_1}\right)$$
This was good because for isothermal process ##\Delta U=0\implies Q=W##
Then I read this
Throughout an entire reversible process, the system is in thermodynamic equilibrium, both physical and chemical, and nearly in pressure and temperature equilibrium with its surroundings. This prevents unbalanced forces and acceleration of moving system boundaries, which in turn avoids friction and other dissipation.
Everything went wrong from here.
For equilibrium, value of Gibb's energy is zero.
$$dG=0\implies dH-TdS_{sys.}=0$$
$$\implies dU+d(PV)-TdS_{sys.}=0$$
Change in internal energy and change in ##(PV)## iis zero for an isothermal process. Therefore,
$$TdS_{sys.}=0\implies dS_{sys.}=0\implies \Delta S_{sys.}=0$$
So why are there two different values of ##\Delta S_{sys.}##?
I thought it could be that one of the above equations involve ##\Delta S_{univ.}## but both involve ##\Delta S_{sys.}##
$$T\Delta S_{sys.}=Q\implies \Delta S_{sys.}=nRln\left(\frac{V_2}{V_1}\right)$$
This was good because for isothermal process ##\Delta U=0\implies Q=W##
Then I read this
Throughout an entire reversible process, the system is in thermodynamic equilibrium, both physical and chemical, and nearly in pressure and temperature equilibrium with its surroundings. This prevents unbalanced forces and acceleration of moving system boundaries, which in turn avoids friction and other dissipation.
Everything went wrong from here.
For equilibrium, value of Gibb's energy is zero.
$$dG=0\implies dH-TdS_{sys.}=0$$
$$\implies dU+d(PV)-TdS_{sys.}=0$$
Change in internal energy and change in ##(PV)## iis zero for an isothermal process. Therefore,
$$TdS_{sys.}=0\implies dS_{sys.}=0\implies \Delta S_{sys.}=0$$
So why are there two different values of ##\Delta S_{sys.}##?
I thought it could be that one of the above equations involve ##\Delta S_{univ.}## but both involve ##\Delta S_{sys.}##